How to Explore the Architectural Qualities of Interactive Architecture - Virtual or physical or both?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21450%2F20%3A00348651" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21450/20:00348651 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

How to Explore the Architectural Qualities of Interactive Architecture - Virtual or physical or both?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

While the theoretical possibilities and implications of interactive architecture are promising, much still is unknown how these can be practically translated towards purposeful deployments. To understand the true dynamic qualities of interactive architecture, the only method is experiencing its hedonic qualities firsthand. To this end, working prototypes need to be realised and their actual impact measured. In this paper, we compare two potential experimental strategies for interactive architecture prototype evaluation, as we benchmark the conceptual, technological and methodological differences between a life-size, physical prototype and an immersive virtual reality simulation. By presenting the preliminary findings of each strategy, we discuss how their unique strengths and weaknesses could complement each other in future research endeavours.

Název v anglickém jazyce

How to Explore the Architectural Qualities of Interactive Architecture - Virtual or physical or both?

Popis výsledku anglicky

While the theoretical possibilities and implications of interactive architecture are promising, much still is unknown how these can be practically translated towards purposeful deployments. To understand the true dynamic qualities of interactive architecture, the only method is experiencing its hedonic qualities firsthand. To this end, working prototypes need to be realised and their actual impact measured. In this paper, we compare two potential experimental strategies for interactive architecture prototype evaluation, as we benchmark the conceptual, technological and methodological differences between a life-size, physical prototype and an immersive virtual reality simulation. By presenting the preliminary findings of each strategy, we discuss how their unique strengths and weaknesses could complement each other in future research endeavours.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20103 - Architecture engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Anthropologic: Architecture and Fabrication in the Cognitive Age.Proceedings of the 38th eCAADe Conference - Volume 2

ISBN

9789491207211

ISSN

2684-1843

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

219-231

Název nakladatele

Technická universita v Berlíně

Místo vydání

Berlín

Místo konání akce

Berlin

Datum konání akce

16. 9. 2020

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000651200700023