Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: Application to Medical Devices

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F14%3A00217543" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/14:00217543 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: Application to Medical Devices

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

At present, complex evaluation of medical devices is very topical. The methods of pharmacoeconomics and cost analyses appear to need some modifications caused by a different character of medical devices. One of the approaches to this task is utilizationof multiple-criteria decision making. In this study, a methodology for medical devices evaluation is suggested based on the multiple-criteria decision making utilized to evaluate the effective part of the cost-effectiveness ratio. This analysis evaluatesnot only costs spent in the par-ticular technology (both procurement and operation costs), but also technical, user´s and clinical parameters of the medical devices. Several methods of mul-tiple-criteria decision making were compared in this study, among others the ideal point method, the weighted sum approach (WSA) and the TOPSIS meth-od. In the pilot implementation, these methods were applied to evaluate lung ventilators. The goal was to compare utilization of various methods, and to

Název v anglickém jazyce

Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: Application to Medical Devices

Popis výsledku anglicky

At present, complex evaluation of medical devices is very topical. The methods of pharmacoeconomics and cost analyses appear to need some modifications caused by a different character of medical devices. One of the approaches to this task is utilizationof multiple-criteria decision making. In this study, a methodology for medical devices evaluation is suggested based on the multiple-criteria decision making utilized to evaluate the effective part of the cost-effectiveness ratio. This analysis evaluatesnot only costs spent in the par-ticular technology (both procurement and operation costs), but also technical, user´s and clinical parameters of the medical devices. Several methods of mul-tiple-criteria decision making were compared in this study, among others the ideal point method, the weighted sum approach (WSA) and the TOPSIS meth-od. In the pilot implementation, these methods were applied to evaluate lung ventilators. The goal was to compare utilization of various methods, and to

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

FS - Lékařská zařízení, přístroje a vybavení

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NT11532" target="_blank" >NT11532: Hodnocení zdravotnických prostředků</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

PROCEEDINGS IWBBIO 2014: 2ND INTERNATIONAL WORK-CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING

ISBN

978-84-15814-84-9

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

1359-1372

Název nakladatele

COPICENTRO GRANADA S L,

Místo vydání

Granada

Místo konání akce

Granada

Datum konání akce

7. 4. 2014

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000346381500144