Performance of different pulse oximeters can affect the duration of field breathing experiments

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F19%3A00336927" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/19:00336927 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EHB47216.2019.8969917" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EHB47216.2019.8969917</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EHB47216.2019.8969917" target="_blank" >10.1109/EHB47216.2019.8969917</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Performance of different pulse oximeters can affect the duration of field breathing experiments

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Pulse oximeters are widely used vital sign monitors, not only in hospitals, but also in the field and outdoor experiments. In field breathing experiments, pulse oximeters and other monitoring devices have to work in non-standard ambient conditions, outside programmed physiological limits and thus their accuracy might be affected. In order to assess the reliability of pulse oximetry as a monitoring method of experimental subjects in field experiments, we used five different pulse oximeter probes to monitor 13 healthy volunteers during a trial, in which they were breathing into simulated avalanche snow. In the course of the trial when desaturation occurred, significant discrepancies in oxygen saturation readings among the oximeters were observed—in the rate of desaturation, the time of its onset, and in the lowest recorded values. These observations suggest that relying on a single parameter, like peripheral oxygen saturation, as a single study endpoint, or as a safety measure, presents a possible safety risk. In future field trials, endpoints should be set on the basis of more parameters and continuous clinical assessment.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Performance of different pulse oximeters can affect the duration of field breathing experiments

Popis výsledku anglicky

Pulse oximeters are widely used vital sign monitors, not only in hospitals, but also in the field and outdoor experiments. In field breathing experiments, pulse oximeters and other monitoring devices have to work in non-standard ambient conditions, outside programmed physiological limits and thus their accuracy might be affected. In order to assess the reliability of pulse oximetry as a monitoring method of experimental subjects in field experiments, we used five different pulse oximeter probes to monitor 13 healthy volunteers during a trial, in which they were breathing into simulated avalanche snow. In the course of the trial when desaturation occurred, significant discrepancies in oxygen saturation readings among the oximeters were observed—in the rate of desaturation, the time of its onset, and in the lowest recorded values. These observations suggest that relying on a single parameter, like peripheral oxygen saturation, as a single study endpoint, or as a safety measure, presents a possible safety risk. In future field trials, endpoints should be set on the basis of more parameters and continuous clinical assessment.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20601 - Medical engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

IEEE E-HEALTH AND BIOENGINEERING EHB 2019

ISBN

978-1-7281-2603-6

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

2575-5145

Počet stran výsledku

4

Strana od-do

—

Název nakladatele

Gr. T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Místo vydání

Iasi

Místo konání akce

Iasi

Datum konání akce

21. 11. 2019

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000558648300049