Exploring the Multivariate Aspects of the Proactive Coping Inventory
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F17%3A63517873" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/17:63517873 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://www.tojet.net/special/2017_12_1.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.tojet.net/special/2017_12_1.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Exploring the Multivariate Aspects of the Proactive Coping Inventory
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The purpose of the present study was to test whether the relationships between the observed proactive coping variables as measured by PCI (Greenglass et al., 1999) and their underlying constructs exist in a priori manner, as the theory would seem to indicate. The psychometric properties for each dimension of the PCI were evaluated using a number of confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) on a medium-size sample (n = 447). After the individual one-factor models were assessed as factorially valid, a combined model could be evaluated. The original 7-factor model (as well as 5-, 4- and 3-factor models) was tested. Based on the results, the 7-factor model best represented the data: (1) Proactive Coping, (2) Preventive Coping, (3) Reflective Coping, (4) Strategic Planning, (5) Instrumental Support, (6) Emotional Support and (7) Avoidance Coping.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Exploring the Multivariate Aspects of the Proactive Coping Inventory
Popis výsledku anglicky
The purpose of the present study was to test whether the relationships between the observed proactive coping variables as measured by PCI (Greenglass et al., 1999) and their underlying constructs exist in a priori manner, as the theory would seem to indicate. The psychometric properties for each dimension of the PCI were evaluated using a number of confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) on a medium-size sample (n = 447). After the individual one-factor models were assessed as factorially valid, a combined model could be evaluated. The original 7-factor model (as well as 5-, 4- and 3-factor models) was tested. Based on the results, the 7-factor model best represented the data: (1) Proactive Coping, (2) Preventive Coping, (3) Reflective Coping, (4) Strategic Planning, (5) Instrumental Support, (6) Emotional Support and (7) Avoidance Coping.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50301 - Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology
ISSN
2146-7242
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2017
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
December
Stát vydavatele periodika
TR - Turecká republika
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
344-350
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85044709449