The Tourism Infrastructure in the Czech Regions – Multi-Criteria Comparison

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F71226401%3A_____%2F18%3AN0100163" target="_blank" >RIV/71226401:_____/18:N0100163 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/70883521:28120/19:63523468

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://ibima.org/conference/32nd-ibima-conference/#ffs-tabbed-15" target="_blank" >https://ibima.org/conference/32nd-ibima-conference/#ffs-tabbed-15</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Tourism Infrastructure in the Czech Regions – Multi-Criteria Comparison

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The regions inside a country might be taken from the tourism point of view as destination areas. Their development and infrastructure can be compared and measured via several mathematical, statistical or econometric models. Reasons for these analysis might be different – the comparison of economic activity, ICT development, natural resources, cultural heritage etc. The aim of this article is to compare the 14 Czech regions from the tourism infrastructure point of view using 22 criteria describing main characteristic of the region infrastructure (culture, healthcare, natural wealth, transport infrastructure, energy, ICT). For the comparison, the TOPSIS method, as one of the multi-criteria evaluation methods, is applied to find out the order of the regions in the years 2015, 2016 and 2017. Afterwards the main differences among both the regions and among the selected years are mentioned.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Tourism Infrastructure in the Czech Regions – Multi-Criteria Comparison

Popis výsledku anglicky

The regions inside a country might be taken from the tourism point of view as destination areas. Their development and infrastructure can be compared and measured via several mathematical, statistical or econometric models. Reasons for these analysis might be different – the comparison of economic activity, ICT development, natural resources, cultural heritage etc. The aim of this article is to compare the 14 Czech regions from the tourism infrastructure point of view using 22 criteria describing main characteristic of the region infrastructure (culture, healthcare, natural wealth, transport infrastructure, energy, ICT). For the comparison, the TOPSIS method, as one of the multi-criteria evaluation methods, is applied to find out the order of the regions in the years 2015, 2016 and 2017. Afterwards the main differences among both the regions and among the selected years are mentioned.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50902 - Social sciences, interdisciplinary

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Proceedings of the 32nd International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA)

ISBN

978-0-9998551-1-9

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

6344

Strana od-do

3336-3344

Název nakladatele

International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA)

Místo vydání

Seville Spain

Místo konání akce

Seville Spain

Datum konání akce

15. 11. 2018

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

000455265500026