General Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods for Finding the Optimal Solution in City Logistics

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F75081431%3A_____%2F20%3A00001747" target="_blank" >RIV/75081431:_____/20:00001747 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/eng/10/1/article-p147.xml" target="_blank" >https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/eng/10/1/article-p147.xml</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/eng-2020-0023" target="_blank" >10.1515/eng-2020-0023</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

General Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods for Finding the Optimal Solution in City Logistics

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of this paper is to familiarize the reader with the general application of MCDM methods on a specific example of City Logistics in order to find the optimal solution for operation of the territory. In its introductory part, methods used for quantitative evaluation of variant solutions are briefly described, and then the so-called Forces Decision Matrix Method (FDMM) including the determination of criteria weights using pairwise comparison of variants according to individual criteria on the specific example is applied. In the final part of the paper, the advantages and disadvantages of using this method for more complex tasks with multiple variant solutions based on the results of the practical example are evaluated and the so-called Saaty’s method based on the quantitative pairwise comparison to partially eliminate differences in the mutual evaluation of weights and criteria is mentioned.

Název v anglickém jazyce

General Application of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods for Finding the Optimal Solution in City Logistics

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of this paper is to familiarize the reader with the general application of MCDM methods on a specific example of City Logistics in order to find the optimal solution for operation of the territory. In its introductory part, methods used for quantitative evaluation of variant solutions are briefly described, and then the so-called Forces Decision Matrix Method (FDMM) including the determination of criteria weights using pairwise comparison of variants according to individual criteria on the specific example is applied. In the final part of the paper, the advantages and disadvantages of using this method for more complex tasks with multiple variant solutions based on the results of the practical example are evaluated and the so-called Saaty’s method based on the quantitative pairwise comparison to partially eliminate differences in the mutual evaluation of weights and criteria is mentioned.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50703 - Transport planning and social aspects of transport (transport engineering to be 2.1)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LTC19009" target="_blank" >LTC19009: Autonomní mobilita v kontextu rozvoje regionu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Open Engineering

ISSN

2391-5439

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

10

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

147-153

Kód UT WoS článku

000519203300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85082338124