Comparison of pencil-type ionization chamber calibration results and methods between dosimetry laboratories
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652052%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000035" target="_blank" >RIV/86652052:_____/16:N0000035 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1120179715009084" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1120179715009084</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.008" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.008</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparison of pencil-type ionization chamber calibration results and methods between dosimetry laboratories
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
A comparison of calibration results and procedures in terms of air kerma length product, PKL, and air kerma, K, was conducted between eight dosimetry laboratories. A pencil-type ionization chamber (IC), generally used for computed tomography dose measurements, was calibrated according to three calibration methods, while its residual signal and other characteristics (sensitivity profile, active length) were assessed. The results showed that the "partial irradiation method" is the preferred method for the pencil-type IC calibration in terms of PKL and it could be applied by the calibration laboratories successfully. Most of the participating laboratories achieved high level of agreement (>99%) for both dosimetry quantities (PKL and K). Estimated relative standard uncertainties of comparison results vary among laboratories from 0.34% to 2.32% depending on the quantity, beam quality and calibration method applied. Detailed analysis of the assigned uncertainties have been presented and discussed.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparison of pencil-type ionization chamber calibration results and methods between dosimetry laboratories
Popis výsledku anglicky
A comparison of calibration results and procedures in terms of air kerma length product, PKL, and air kerma, K, was conducted between eight dosimetry laboratories. A pencil-type ionization chamber (IC), generally used for computed tomography dose measurements, was calibrated according to three calibration methods, while its residual signal and other characteristics (sensitivity profile, active length) were assessed. The results showed that the "partial irradiation method" is the preferred method for the pencil-type IC calibration in terms of PKL and it could be applied by the calibration laboratories successfully. Most of the participating laboratories achieved high level of agreement (>99%) for both dosimetry quantities (PKL and K). Estimated relative standard uncertainties of comparison results vary among laboratories from 0.34% to 2.32% depending on the quantity, beam quality and calibration method applied. Detailed analysis of the assigned uncertainties have been presented and discussed.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20601 - Medical engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Physica medica
ISSN
1120-1797
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
32
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
42-51
Kód UT WoS článku
000369647300006
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84951104496