Circulation-Conditioned Wintertime Temperature Bias in EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Models Over Central Europe
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F18%3A00496412" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/18:00496412 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/68378289:_____/18:00492602
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018JD028503" target="_blank" >https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018JD028503</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028503" target="_blank" >10.1029/2018JD028503</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Circulation-Conditioned Wintertime Temperature Bias in EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Models Over Central Europe
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
We analyze circulation-conditioned wintertime temperature biases in regional climate models (RCMs) over Central Europe and link them to simulation of cold days. Daily minimum and maximum temperatures from the European Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment RCMs are evaluated against reference data from the E-OBS gridded data set. Flow direction is analyzed through u- and v-wind components at the 850-hPa pressure level taken from the ERA-Interim reanalysis. Cloud cover and snow-area fraction from the same reanalysis are used to associate the temperature biases with physical mechanisms. Distribution of flow directions during cold days is evaluated using efficiency coefficients, calculated as ratios of the relative abundance of flow directions during cold days and their wintertime climatology. RCMs driven by the reanalysis have both positive and negative minimum temperature biases, ranging from +0.7 to2.7 degrees C. By contrast, all reanalysis-driven RCMs have negative maximum temperature biases, especially during northerly and westerly advection, which is probably related to overestimated cloud cover. The too-cold westerly and northerly flows are associated with an overestimated number of cold days and relatively high values of efficiency coefficients under these directions. Efficiency coefficients are simulated better under southeasterly advection, during which the temperature bias tends to be the lowest. The results suggest that simulated cold events should be analyzed and interpreted with caution, since they may develop also under zonal flow in some models, which contradicts observations.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Circulation-Conditioned Wintertime Temperature Bias in EURO-CORDEX Regional Climate Models Over Central Europe
Popis výsledku anglicky
We analyze circulation-conditioned wintertime temperature biases in regional climate models (RCMs) over Central Europe and link them to simulation of cold days. Daily minimum and maximum temperatures from the European Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment RCMs are evaluated against reference data from the E-OBS gridded data set. Flow direction is analyzed through u- and v-wind components at the 850-hPa pressure level taken from the ERA-Interim reanalysis. Cloud cover and snow-area fraction from the same reanalysis are used to associate the temperature biases with physical mechanisms. Distribution of flow directions during cold days is evaluated using efficiency coefficients, calculated as ratios of the relative abundance of flow directions during cold days and their wintertime climatology. RCMs driven by the reanalysis have both positive and negative minimum temperature biases, ranging from +0.7 to2.7 degrees C. By contrast, all reanalysis-driven RCMs have negative maximum temperature biases, especially during northerly and westerly advection, which is probably related to overestimated cloud cover. The too-cold westerly and northerly flows are associated with an overestimated number of cold days and relatively high values of efficiency coefficients under these directions. Efficiency coefficients are simulated better under southeasterly advection, during which the temperature bias tends to be the lowest. The results suggest that simulated cold events should be analyzed and interpreted with caution, since they may develop also under zonal flow in some models, which contradicts observations.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10509 - Meteorology and atmospheric sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres
ISSN
2169-897X
e-ISSN
2169-8996
Svazek periodika
123
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
16
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
8661-8673
Kód UT WoS článku
000445331900017
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85052816364