Multiple conceptualizations of nature are key to inclusivity and legitimacy in global environmental governance

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F20%3A00524191" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/20:00524191 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901119303491?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901119303491?via%3Dihub</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.018" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.018</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Multiple conceptualizations of nature are key to inclusivity and legitimacy in global environmental governance

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Despite increasing scientific understanding of the global environmental crisis, we struggle to adopt the policies science suggests would be effective. One of the reasons for that is the lack of inclusive engagement and dialogue among a wide range of different actors. Furthermore, there is a lack of consideration of differences between languages, worldviews and cultures. In this paper, we propose that engagement across the science-policy interface can be strengthened by being mindful of the breadth and depth of the diverse human-nature relations found around the globe. By examining diverse conceptualizations of ”nature” in more than 60 languages, we identify three clusters: inclusive conceptualizations where humans are viewed as an integral component of nature, non-inclusive conceptualizations where humans are separate from nature, and deifying conceptualizations where nature is understood and experienced within a spiritual dimension.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Multiple conceptualizations of nature are key to inclusivity and legitimacy in global environmental governance

Popis výsledku anglicky

Despite increasing scientific understanding of the global environmental crisis, we struggle to adopt the policies science suggests would be effective. One of the reasons for that is the lack of inclusive engagement and dialogue among a wide range of different actors. Furthermore, there is a lack of consideration of differences between languages, worldviews and cultures. In this paper, we propose that engagement across the science-policy interface can be strengthened by being mindful of the breadth and depth of the diverse human-nature relations found around the globe. By examining diverse conceptualizations of ”nature” in more than 60 languages, we identify three clusters: inclusive conceptualizations where humans are viewed as an integral component of nature, non-inclusive conceptualizations where humans are separate from nature, and deifying conceptualizations where nature is understood and experienced within a spiritual dimension.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Environmental Science & Policy

ISSN

1462-9011

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

104

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

FEB

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

36-42

Kód UT WoS článku

000513291300004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85075071617