Sustainability-aligned values: exploring the concept, evidence, and practice
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F24%3A00602504" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/24:00602504 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol29/iss4/art18/" target="_blank" >https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol29/iss4/art18/</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-15498-290418" target="_blank" >10.5751/ES-15498-290418</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Sustainability-aligned values: exploring the concept, evidence, and practice
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Modern environmental thought has always involved normative claims about the values needed for sustainability. This has often played out in debates between proponents of anthropocentric and ecocentric ways of valuing nature. More recently, there has been a flourishing of interest in relational and pluricentric ways of valuing nature, coinciding with a ´turn to values´ in the sustainability literature. In this paper we explore the meaning and use of the term ´sustainability-aligned values.´ Following the 2022 IPBES Values Assessment we consider these as values that are crucial for shaping decisions that will help bring about sustainability. Our characterization of sustainably-aligned values assumes inherent pluralism because of diverse interpretations of sustainability and of pathways toward it. Nevertheless, a review of three bodies of literature suggests that there is considerable agreement about the kinds of values that align with sustainability. In particular, the nurturing of certain relational values is now widely seen as supportive of sustainability, including values regarding what matters in human interactions with nature (such as stewardship), and values regarding relationships between humans (such as collectivism). We proceed to pose critical questions about the proposition that certain values support sustainability. We ask whether this emerging body of thought is consistent with pluralist requirements to foster values diversity, whether an agenda to nurture values aligned with sustainability is actionable, and how mobilizing sustainability-aligned values entails addressing power imbalances.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Sustainability-aligned values: exploring the concept, evidence, and practice
Popis výsledku anglicky
Modern environmental thought has always involved normative claims about the values needed for sustainability. This has often played out in debates between proponents of anthropocentric and ecocentric ways of valuing nature. More recently, there has been a flourishing of interest in relational and pluricentric ways of valuing nature, coinciding with a ´turn to values´ in the sustainability literature. In this paper we explore the meaning and use of the term ´sustainability-aligned values.´ Following the 2022 IPBES Values Assessment we consider these as values that are crucial for shaping decisions that will help bring about sustainability. Our characterization of sustainably-aligned values assumes inherent pluralism because of diverse interpretations of sustainability and of pathways toward it. Nevertheless, a review of three bodies of literature suggests that there is considerable agreement about the kinds of values that align with sustainability. In particular, the nurturing of certain relational values is now widely seen as supportive of sustainability, including values regarding what matters in human interactions with nature (such as stewardship), and values regarding relationships between humans (such as collectivism). We proceed to pose critical questions about the proposition that certain values support sustainability. We ask whether this emerging body of thought is consistent with pluralist requirements to foster values diversity, whether an agenda to nurture values aligned with sustainability is actionable, and how mobilizing sustainability-aligned values entails addressing power imbalances.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50704 - Environmental sciences (social aspects)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/8F20015" target="_blank" >8F20015: Environmental justice analysis to advance rural landscape transformations in the face of climate change</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Ecology and Society
ISSN
1708-3087
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
29
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
CA - Kanada
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
18
Kód UT WoS článku
001367321600003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85210068984