Comments on "Analysis of water-carbon-ecological footprints and resource-environment pressure in the Triangle of Central China" by Yizhong Chen, Hongwei Lu, Pengdong Yan, Yiyang Yange, Jing Li and Jun Xia [Ecological Indicators, 125, 107448]

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020711%3A_____%2F21%3A00005111" target="_blank" >RIV/00020711:_____/21:00005111 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21004684?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21004684?via%3Dihub</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107803" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107803</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comments on "Analysis of water-carbon-ecological footprints and resource-environment pressure in the Triangle of Central China" by Yizhong Chen, Hongwei Lu, Pengdong Yan, Yiyang Yange, Jing Li and Jun Xia [Ecological Indicators, 125, 107448]

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In recent years, water footprint, carbon footprint and ecological footprint have become popular tools for environmental assessment. These footprint methodologies are part of the environmental footprint family but describe different types of environmental assessment. Water footprint methodology is, in most cases, analogous to ecological footprint methodology but deviates at some points. These two indicators are focused on the depletion of natural resources. The carbon footprint is focused on the impacts linked to GHGs emissions. The case study of the Triangle of Central China (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107448) uses all of these methodologies but the term &quot;water footprint&quot; is incorrectly used. This Letter to Editors would like to call attention to some important inaccuracies and ambiguities in the article.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comments on "Analysis of water-carbon-ecological footprints and resource-environment pressure in the Triangle of Central China" by Yizhong Chen, Hongwei Lu, Pengdong Yan, Yiyang Yange, Jing Li and Jun Xia [Ecological Indicators, 125, 107448]

Popis výsledku anglicky

In recent years, water footprint, carbon footprint and ecological footprint have become popular tools for environmental assessment. These footprint methodologies are part of the environmental footprint family but describe different types of environmental assessment. Water footprint methodology is, in most cases, analogous to ecological footprint methodology but deviates at some points. These two indicators are focused on the depletion of natural resources. The carbon footprint is focused on the impacts linked to GHGs emissions. The case study of the Triangle of Central China (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107448) uses all of these methodologies but the term &quot;water footprint&quot; is incorrectly used. This Letter to Editors would like to call attention to some important inaccuracies and ambiguities in the article.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10503 - Water resources

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS

ISSN

1470-160X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

127

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

127

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

3

Strana od-do

107803

Kód UT WoS článku

000658937700001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85105848535