Why don't scientists follow the Water Footprint Assessment Manual? Example of one study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020711%3A_____%2F23%3A10154938" target="_blank" >RIV/00020711:_____/23:10154938 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9249" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9249</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su15129249" target="_blank" >10.3390/su15129249</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Why don't scientists follow the Water Footprint Assessment Manual? Example of one study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
A recently published study by Parra-Orobio et al. looked at a water footprint assessment in low-income urban neighborhoods from developing countries; specifically, this is a case study of the Fátima site in the municipality of Gamarra, Colombia. However, that study deviates significantly from the water footprint methodology described in the Water Footprint Assessment Manual. Therefore, the results of the study cannot be compared with similar studies. In this Letter to the Editors, different parts of the application of the water footprint methodology used in the mentioned study are analyzed and several main deviations from the standard water footprint methodology are pointed out. It is, therefore, suggested that the authors of the article "Assessment of the Water Footprint in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods from Developing Countries: Case Study Fátima (Gamarra, Colombia)" should expand or modify this article to clarify any deviations from the standard water footprint methodology.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Why don't scientists follow the Water Footprint Assessment Manual? Example of one study
Popis výsledku anglicky
A recently published study by Parra-Orobio et al. looked at a water footprint assessment in low-income urban neighborhoods from developing countries; specifically, this is a case study of the Fátima site in the municipality of Gamarra, Colombia. However, that study deviates significantly from the water footprint methodology described in the Water Footprint Assessment Manual. Therefore, the results of the study cannot be compared with similar studies. In this Letter to the Editors, different parts of the application of the water footprint methodology used in the mentioned study are analyzed and several main deviations from the standard water footprint methodology are pointed out. It is, therefore, suggested that the authors of the article "Assessment of the Water Footprint in Low-Income Urban Neighborhoods from Developing Countries: Case Study Fátima (Gamarra, Colombia)" should expand or modify this article to clarify any deviations from the standard water footprint methodology.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Sustainability
ISSN
2071-1050
e-ISSN
2071-1050
Svazek periodika
15
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
12
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
5
Strana od-do
9249
Kód UT WoS článku
001017807400001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85164112573