Response to Comment on "Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale" - aar5245

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027073%3A_____%2F18%3AN0000071" target="_blank" >RIV/00027073:_____/18:N0000071 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6391/eaar5245" target="_blank" >http://science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6391/eaar5245</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Response to Comment on "Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale" - aar5245

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Chisholm and Fung claim that our method of estimating conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD) in recruitment is systematically biased, and present an alternative method that shows no latitudinal pattern in CNDD. We demonstrate that their approach produces strongly biased estimates of CNDD, explaining why they do not detect a latitudinal pattern.We also address their methodological concerns using an alternative distance-weighted approach, which supports our original findings of a latitudinal gradient in CNDD and a latitudinal shift in the relationship between CNDD and species abundance. SCIENCE Volume: 360 Issue: 6391 Article Number: aar5245 DOI: 10.1126/science.aar5245 Published: MAY 25 2018 Document Type:Editorial Material Language:English Accession Number: WOS:000433039800004 PubMed ID: 29798855 ISSN: 0036-8075 eISSN: 1095-9203

Název v anglickém jazyce

Response to Comment on "Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale" - aar5245

Popis výsledku anglicky

Chisholm and Fung claim that our method of estimating conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD) in recruitment is systematically biased, and present an alternative method that shows no latitudinal pattern in CNDD. We demonstrate that their approach produces strongly biased estimates of CNDD, explaining why they do not detect a latitudinal pattern.We also address their methodological concerns using an alternative distance-weighted approach, which supports our original findings of a latitudinal gradient in CNDD and a latitudinal shift in the relationship between CNDD and species abundance. SCIENCE Volume: 360 Issue: 6391 Article Number: aar5245 DOI: 10.1126/science.aar5245 Published: MAY 25 2018 Document Type:Editorial Material Language:English Accession Number: WOS:000433039800004 PubMed ID: 29798855 ISSN: 0036-8075 eISSN: 1095-9203

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

40102 - Forestry

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA16-18022S" target="_blank" >GA16-18022S: Časoprostorové rozdíly v kompetici mezi temperátním a tropickým lesem: záležitost diverzity</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů