Response to comment on “Plant diversity incrases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale” (doi:10.1126/science.aar5245)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F18%3A00507152" target="_blank" >RIV/60077344:_____/18:00507152 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.science.org/doi/reader/10.1126/science.aar5245" target="_blank" >https://www.science.org/doi/reader/10.1126/science.aar5245</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Response to comment on “Plant diversity incrases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale” (doi:10.1126/science.aar5245)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Chisholm and Fung claim that our method of estimating conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD) in recruitment is systematically biased, and present an alternative method that shows no latitudinal pattern in CNDD. We demonstrate that their approach produces strongly biased estimates of CNDD, explaining why they do not detect a latitudinal pattern. We also address their methodological concerns using an alternative distance-weighted approach, which supports our original findings of a latitudinal gradient in CNDD and a latitudinal shift in the relationship between CNDD and species abundance.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Response to comment on “Plant diversity incrases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale” (doi:10.1126/science.aar5245)

Popis výsledku anglicky

Chisholm and Fung claim that our method of estimating conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD) in recruitment is systematically biased, and present an alternative method that shows no latitudinal pattern in CNDD. We demonstrate that their approach produces strongly biased estimates of CNDD, explaining why they do not detect a latitudinal pattern. We also address their methodological concerns using an alternative distance-weighted approach, which supports our original findings of a latitudinal gradient in CNDD and a latitudinal shift in the relationship between CNDD and species abundance.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10618 - Ecology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů