Risk of drain contamination after joint replacement

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064203%3A_____%2F16%3A10335327" target="_blank" >RIV/00064203:_____/16:10335327 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11110/16:10335327

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Risk of drain contamination after joint replacement

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Invasive entries disturbing the skin integrity such as drains, cannulas and percutaneously inserted osteosynthetic materials infection risk factors. Currently, a discussion is underway as to whether surgical wounds in joint replacements should be drained or not. Methods: Examined over the period of three years were samples of 198 patients after the total endoprosthesis (TEP) implantation, or after TEP revision or re-implantation for an aseptic release. These were the knee or hip joints TEP. The Redon drains were inserted in a standardised method in conventional topical conditions. The samples were processed in the IFCOR 99 Molecular Genetics Laboratory. Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method were carried out for each collected sample (irrigation solution as well as a part of the drain). Conclusion: It has been confirmed that draining a surgical wound is a standard and safe method which is clearly beneficial to the patient by minimising local risks to the wound healing. The evaluation of outcomes also indicates that there is no need for an individual approach to drainage systems in different types of implants. Based on the outcomes of this study, we recommend retaining drains until the second postoperative day.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Risk of drain contamination after joint replacement

Popis výsledku anglicky

Invasive entries disturbing the skin integrity such as drains, cannulas and percutaneously inserted osteosynthetic materials infection risk factors. Currently, a discussion is underway as to whether surgical wounds in joint replacements should be drained or not. Methods: Examined over the period of three years were samples of 198 patients after the total endoprosthesis (TEP) implantation, or after TEP revision or re-implantation for an aseptic release. These were the knee or hip joints TEP. The Redon drains were inserted in a standardised method in conventional topical conditions. The samples were processed in the IFCOR 99 Molecular Genetics Laboratory. Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method were carried out for each collected sample (irrigation solution as well as a part of the drain). Conclusion: It has been confirmed that draining a surgical wound is a standard and safe method which is clearly beneficial to the patient by minimising local risks to the wound healing. The evaluation of outcomes also indicates that there is no need for an individual approach to drainage systems in different types of implants. Based on the outcomes of this study, we recommend retaining drains until the second postoperative day.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

FI - Traumatologie a ortopedie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Interdisciplinary Updates on Health in Europe

ISBN

978-83-7520-214-4

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

85-106

Počet stran knihy

467

Název nakladatele

Warsaw Management University Publishing House Prof. Leszka J. Krzyżanowskiego

Místo vydání

Warsaw

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—