Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of significant renal artery stenosis
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00179906%3A_____%2F11%3A10108579" target="_blank" >RIV/00179906:_____/11:10108579 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11150/11:10108579
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of significant renal artery stenosis
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The aim of our study was to evaluate duplex ultrasonography (DUS) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detection of haemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (RAS). The study included patients with high clinical suspicion of renovascularhypertension (RVH). The imaging of renal arteries was performed by DUD. MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Significant RAS was defined as maximum systolic velocity_ 180 cm/sec (DUS) or as 60% reduction of the endoluminal arterial diameter (MRA.DSA). The results of DUS and MRA were assessed in respect to the results of DSA. Arterial supply of 186 kidneys in 94 patients was evaluated. DSA revealed significant RAS in 61 kidneys evaluated. DUS was not able to examine arterial supply in 18 kidneys of 13 patients. In the detection of significant RAS.DUS was characterized by sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 84%. MRA achieved satisfactory imaging quality in all but one kidney evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of MRA i
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of significant renal artery stenosis
Popis výsledku anglicky
The aim of our study was to evaluate duplex ultrasonography (DUS) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in detection of haemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (RAS). The study included patients with high clinical suspicion of renovascularhypertension (RVH). The imaging of renal arteries was performed by DUD. MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Significant RAS was defined as maximum systolic velocity_ 180 cm/sec (DUS) or as 60% reduction of the endoluminal arterial diameter (MRA.DSA). The results of DUS and MRA were assessed in respect to the results of DSA. Arterial supply of 186 kidneys in 94 patients was evaluated. DSA revealed significant RAS in 61 kidneys evaluated. DUS was not able to examine arterial supply in 18 kidneys of 13 patients. In the detection of significant RAS.DUS was characterized by sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 84%. MRA achieved satisfactory imaging quality in all but one kidney evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of MRA i
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FA - Kardiovaskulární nemoci včetně kardiochirurgie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2011
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta medica (Hradec Králové) / Universitas Carolina, Facultas Medica Hradec Kralove
ISSN
1211-4286
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
54
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
3
Strana od-do
9-12
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—