Comparison of 3 Fusion Techniques in the Treatment of the Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease. Is Stand-Alone Autograft Really the "Gold Standard?" Prospective Study With 2-Year Follow-up

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F12%3A12167" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/12:12167 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825413fe" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825413fe</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of 3 Fusion Techniques in the Treatment of the Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease. Is Stand-Alone Autograft Really the "Gold Standard?" Prospective Study With 2-Year Follow-up

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Study Design. A prospective study. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the 3 different methods of interbody fusion of the cervical spine-autograft in stand-alone technique, autograft with anterior plate, and polyetheretherketone cage supported by anterior plate. The clinical and radiological data obtained were analyzed and discussed. Summary of Background Data. Although degenerative cervical spine disease has been treated by an anterior approach for more than 50 years, there is not one generally accepted operative approach. There is a very low-quality evidence of little or no difference in pain relief between each of the techniques. Iliac crest autograft still seems to be the "gold standard" for interbody fusion. Methods. Prospective studycollecting clinical and radiological data of 81 patients undergoing anterior cervical interbody fusion, in which the interbody fusion of 1 or 2 motion segments from C3 to C7 was done by any of the 3 techniques-stand-alone insertion of aut

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of 3 Fusion Techniques in the Treatment of the Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease. Is Stand-Alone Autograft Really the "Gold Standard?" Prospective Study With 2-Year Follow-up

Popis výsledku anglicky

Study Design. A prospective study. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the 3 different methods of interbody fusion of the cervical spine-autograft in stand-alone technique, autograft with anterior plate, and polyetheretherketone cage supported by anterior plate. The clinical and radiological data obtained were analyzed and discussed. Summary of Background Data. Although degenerative cervical spine disease has been treated by an anterior approach for more than 50 years, there is not one generally accepted operative approach. There is a very low-quality evidence of little or no difference in pain relief between each of the techniques. Iliac crest autograft still seems to be the "gold standard" for interbody fusion. Methods. Prospective studycollecting clinical and radiological data of 81 patients undergoing anterior cervical interbody fusion, in which the interbody fusion of 1 or 2 motion segments from C3 to C7 was done by any of the 3 techniques-stand-alone insertion of aut

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

FH - Neurologie, neurochirurgie, neurovědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Spine

ISSN

0362-2436

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

37

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

19

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

1645-1651

Kód UT WoS článku

000308352300013

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—