How to Write a Systematic Review Article and Meta-Analysis
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F17%3A10365513" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/17:10365513 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bbd.i" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bbd.i</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bbd.i" target="_blank" >10.5334/bbd.i</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
How to Write a Systematic Review Article and Meta-Analysis
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In science, a review article refers to work that provides a comprehensive and systematic summary of results available in a given field while making it possible to see the topic under consideration from a new perspective. Drawing on recent studies by other researchers, the authors of a review article make a critical analysis and summarize, appraise, and classify available data to offer a synthesis of the latest research in a specific subject area, ultimately arriving at new cumulative conclusions. According to Baumeister and Leary (1997), the goal of such synthesis may include (a) theory development, (b) theory evaluation, (c) a survey of the state of knowledge on a particular topic, (d) problem identification, and (e) provision of a historical account of the development of theory and research on a particular topic. A review can also be useful in science and practical life for many other reasons, such as in policy making (Bero & Jadad, 1997). Review articles have become necessary to advance addiction science, but providing a systematic summary of existing evidence while coming up with new ideas and pointing out the unique contribution of the work may pose the greatest challenge for inexperienced authors.
Název v anglickém jazyce
How to Write a Systematic Review Article and Meta-Analysis
Popis výsledku anglicky
In science, a review article refers to work that provides a comprehensive and systematic summary of results available in a given field while making it possible to see the topic under consideration from a new perspective. Drawing on recent studies by other researchers, the authors of a review article make a critical analysis and summarize, appraise, and classify available data to offer a synthesis of the latest research in a specific subject area, ultimately arriving at new cumulative conclusions. According to Baumeister and Leary (1997), the goal of such synthesis may include (a) theory development, (b) theory evaluation, (c) a survey of the state of knowledge on a particular topic, (d) problem identification, and (e) provision of a historical account of the development of theory and research on a particular topic. A review can also be useful in science and practical life for many other reasons, such as in policy making (Bero & Jadad, 1997). Review articles have become necessary to advance addiction science, but providing a systematic summary of existing evidence while coming up with new ideas and pointing out the unique contribution of the work may pose the greatest challenge for inexperienced authors.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30312 - Substance abuse
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2017
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Publishing Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed
ISBN
978-1-911529-08-8
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
173-189
Počet stran knihy
381
Název nakladatele
Ubiquity Press
Místo vydání
London
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—