Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

A Randomized Comparison of Non-Channeled Glidescope(TM) Titanium Versus Channeled KingVision(TM) Videolaryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Obese Patients with BMI > 35 kg.m(-2)

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F20%3A10419783" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/20:10419783 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00064165:_____/20:10419783 RIV/00216224:14110/20:00120959

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=.6e_FClCFU" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=.6e_FClCFU</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10121024" target="_blank" >10.3390/diagnostics10121024</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    A Randomized Comparison of Non-Channeled Glidescope(TM) Titanium Versus Channeled KingVision(TM) Videolaryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Obese Patients with BMI > 35 kg.m(-2)

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Videolaryngoscopes may improve intubating conditions in obese patients. A total of 110 patients with a body mass index &gt; 35 kg center dot m(-2) were prospectively randomized to tracheal intubation using non-channeled Glidescope Titanium or channeled King Vision videolaryngoscope. The primary outcome was the time to tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included: total success rate, number of attempts, the quality of visualization, peri-procedural and post-proceduralcomplications. Time to the first effective breath was shorter with the King Vision (median; 95% CI)-36; 34-39 s vs. 42; 40-50 in the Glidescope group (p = 0.007). The total success rate was higher in the Glidescope group-100% vs. 89.1% (p = 0.03). There was a higher incidence of moderate and difficult laryngoscopy in the King Vision group. No difference was recorded in first attempt success rates, total number of attempts, use of additional maneuvers, intraoperative trauma, or any significant decrease in SpO(2) during intubation. No serious complications were noted and the incidence of postoperative complaints was without difference. Although tracheal intubation with King Vision showed shorter time to the first breath, total success was higher in the Glidescope group, and all but one patients where intubation failed with the KingVision were subsequently intubated with the Glidescope.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    A Randomized Comparison of Non-Channeled Glidescope(TM) Titanium Versus Channeled KingVision(TM) Videolaryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Obese Patients with BMI > 35 kg.m(-2)

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Videolaryngoscopes may improve intubating conditions in obese patients. A total of 110 patients with a body mass index &gt; 35 kg center dot m(-2) were prospectively randomized to tracheal intubation using non-channeled Glidescope Titanium or channeled King Vision videolaryngoscope. The primary outcome was the time to tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included: total success rate, number of attempts, the quality of visualization, peri-procedural and post-proceduralcomplications. Time to the first effective breath was shorter with the King Vision (median; 95% CI)-36; 34-39 s vs. 42; 40-50 in the Glidescope group (p = 0.007). The total success rate was higher in the Glidescope group-100% vs. 89.1% (p = 0.03). There was a higher incidence of moderate and difficult laryngoscopy in the King Vision group. No difference was recorded in first attempt success rates, total number of attempts, use of additional maneuvers, intraoperative trauma, or any significant decrease in SpO(2) during intubation. No serious complications were noted and the incidence of postoperative complaints was without difference. Although tracheal intubation with King Vision showed shorter time to the first breath, total success was higher in the Glidescope group, and all but one patients where intubation failed with the KingVision were subsequently intubated with the Glidescope.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30223 - Anaesthesiology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2020

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Diagnostics [online]

  • ISSN

    2075-4418

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    10

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    12

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CH - Švýcarská konfederace

  • Počet stran výsledku

    11

  • Strana od-do

    1024

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000601930500001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus