Radiographical magnification of the shoulder region: Recommendation for preoperative planning

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11110%2F24%3A10480479" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11110/24:10480479 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00064203:_____/24:10480479

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=M44J6eykPs" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=M44J6eykPs</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11678-024-00802-x" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11678-024-00802-x</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Radiographical magnification of the shoulder region: Recommendation for preoperative planning

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Background: Calibration of shoulder radiographs is required for accurate preoperative planning. Current practice mostly uses an empirical fixed calibration factor of 5%, and limited information is available about how the magnification of the glenohumeral region differs among patients. This retrospective observational study analyzed the patient-specific magnification factor in total shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: Radiographs of 94 patients with unilateral total shoulder arthroplasty (SMR Reverse Shoulder System, Lima Ltd., San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) were obtained from archives. The reverse humeral body diameter was used as internal reference. The measured radiographical magnifications were correlated with the patients&apos; sex, weight, and height. Results: The average magnification factor of the glenohumeral region was 11.9% (standard deviation: 3.2%, range: 5.7-20.3%). No statistically significant difference in radiographic magnification was found between the male and the female patients. The magnification factor was higher in patients with higher weight (p &lt; 0.05), but the explanatory power of the model was weak (R = 0.09). Conclusions: The observed radiographic magnification was considerably higher than a commonly used fixed calibration factor of 5% and exhibited considerable variability among the patients. Therefore, standard radiographs might not be appropriate for accurate preoperative templating, and we recommend using either computer tomography data or calibrating radiographs through external calibration markers for each patient.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Radiographical magnification of the shoulder region: Recommendation for preoperative planning

Popis výsledku anglicky

Background: Calibration of shoulder radiographs is required for accurate preoperative planning. Current practice mostly uses an empirical fixed calibration factor of 5%, and limited information is available about how the magnification of the glenohumeral region differs among patients. This retrospective observational study analyzed the patient-specific magnification factor in total shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: Radiographs of 94 patients with unilateral total shoulder arthroplasty (SMR Reverse Shoulder System, Lima Ltd., San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) were obtained from archives. The reverse humeral body diameter was used as internal reference. The measured radiographical magnifications were correlated with the patients&apos; sex, weight, and height. Results: The average magnification factor of the glenohumeral region was 11.9% (standard deviation: 3.2%, range: 5.7-20.3%). No statistically significant difference in radiographic magnification was found between the male and the female patients. The magnification factor was higher in patients with higher weight (p &lt; 0.05), but the explanatory power of the model was weak (R = 0.09). Conclusions: The observed radiographic magnification was considerably higher than a commonly used fixed calibration factor of 5% and exhibited considerable variability among the patients. Therefore, standard radiographs might not be appropriate for accurate preoperative templating, and we recommend using either computer tomography data or calibrating radiographs through external calibration markers for each patient.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30211 - Orthopaedics

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NU21-06-00084" target="_blank" >NU21-06-00084: Vliv typu polyetylénu UHMWPE na životnost náhrady kolenního kloubu a souvislost s designem kloubních ploch implantátu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Obere Extremitaet

ISSN

1862-6599

e-ISSN

1862-6602

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

5

Strana od-do

283-287

Kód UT WoS článku

001223789700002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85193343126