Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Radiographical magnification of the shoulder region

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F24%3A00375104" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/24:00375104 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-024-00802-x" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-024-00802-x</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11678-024-00802-x" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11678-024-00802-x</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Radiographical magnification of the shoulder region

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Background Calibration of shoulder radiographs is required for accurate preoperative planning. Current practice mostly uses an empirical fixed calibration factor of 5%, and limited information is available about how the magnification of the glenohumeral region differs among patients. This retrospective observational study analyzed the patient-specific magnification factor in total shoulder arthroplasty. Methods Radiographs of 94 patients with unilateral total shoulder arthroplasty (SMR Reverse Shoulder System, Lima Ltd., San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) were obtained from archives. The reverse humeral body diameter was used as internal reference. The measured radiographical magnifications were correlated with the patients’ sex, weight, and height. Results The average magnification factor of the glenohumeral region was 11.9% (standard deviation: 3.2%, range: 5.7–20.3%). No statistically significant difference in radiographic magnification was found between the male and the female patients. The magnification factor was higher in patients with higher weight (p < 0.05), but the explanatory power of the model was weak (R = 0.09). Conclusions The observed radiographic magnification was considerably higher than a commonly used fixed calibration factor of 5% and exhibited considerable variability among the patients. Therefore, standard radiographs might not be appropriate for accurate preoperative templating, and we recommend using either computer tomography data or calibrating radiographs through external calibration markers for each patient.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Radiographical magnification of the shoulder region

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Background Calibration of shoulder radiographs is required for accurate preoperative planning. Current practice mostly uses an empirical fixed calibration factor of 5%, and limited information is available about how the magnification of the glenohumeral region differs among patients. This retrospective observational study analyzed the patient-specific magnification factor in total shoulder arthroplasty. Methods Radiographs of 94 patients with unilateral total shoulder arthroplasty (SMR Reverse Shoulder System, Lima Ltd., San Daniele del Friuli, Italy) were obtained from archives. The reverse humeral body diameter was used as internal reference. The measured radiographical magnifications were correlated with the patients’ sex, weight, and height. Results The average magnification factor of the glenohumeral region was 11.9% (standard deviation: 3.2%, range: 5.7–20.3%). No statistically significant difference in radiographic magnification was found between the male and the female patients. The magnification factor was higher in patients with higher weight (p < 0.05), but the explanatory power of the model was weak (R = 0.09). Conclusions The observed radiographic magnification was considerably higher than a commonly used fixed calibration factor of 5% and exhibited considerable variability among the patients. Therefore, standard radiographs might not be appropriate for accurate preoperative templating, and we recommend using either computer tomography data or calibrating radiographs through external calibration markers for each patient.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30211 - Orthopaedics

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Obere Extremität

  • ISSN

    1862-6602

  • e-ISSN

    1862-6602

  • Svazek periodika

    19

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    4

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    DE - Spolková republika Německo

  • Počet stran výsledku

    5

  • Strana od-do

    283-287

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001223789700002

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85193343126