Longer-term outcomes after bicuspid aortic valve repair in 142 patients
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11150%2F21%3A10431732" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11150/21:10431732 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00179906:_____/21:10431732
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=yczuhT6jSq" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=yczuhT6jSq</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.16006" target="_blank" >10.1111/jocs.16006</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Longer-term outcomes after bicuspid aortic valve repair in 142 patients
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the longer-term results of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair with or without aortic root replacement. Methods: From 1999 to 2017, 142 patients with or without aortic root dilatation who underwent repair of a regurgitant BAV were included in the study. Ninety-four patients underwent isolated BAV repair (Group 1; median age 43 years) and 48 patients underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement plus BAV repair (aortic valve reimplantation-Group 2; median age 48 years). Median clinical follow-up time was 5.9 years (range 0.5-15) in Group 1 and 3 years (range 0.5-16) in Group 2, respectively. Results: In-hospital mortality was 1% in Group 1, and 2% in Group 2 (p = .6). The 5- and 10-year survival was 93 +- 2.9% and 81 +- 5.8% in Group 1 and 96 +- 3.1% and 96 +- 3.1% in Group 2, respectively (p = .31). Eleven patients of Group 1 (1.7%/ patient-year) and five patients of Group 2 (2.2%/patient-year) underwent reoperation of the aortic valve (p = .5). The 5- and 10-year freedom from reoperation were 93.0 +- 2.1% and 77.1 +- 7.1% in Group 1 and 93.0 +- 5.0% and 76.7 +- 9.6% in Group 2 (p = .83), respectively. At the latest follow-up, only two patients of Group 1 and 1 patient of Group 2 had AV regurgitation = 2° (p = .7). The cumulative linearized incidence of all valve-related complications (bleeding, stroke, endocarditis, and reoperation) was 2.9%/patient-year in Group 1% and 4%/patient-year in Group 2, respectively (p = .6). Conclusions: Isolated BAV repair and combined aortic valve reimplantation plus BAV repair provide good clinical longer-term outcomes with relatively low reoperation rate and durable valve function.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Longer-term outcomes after bicuspid aortic valve repair in 142 patients
Popis výsledku anglicky
Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the longer-term results of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) repair with or without aortic root replacement. Methods: From 1999 to 2017, 142 patients with or without aortic root dilatation who underwent repair of a regurgitant BAV were included in the study. Ninety-four patients underwent isolated BAV repair (Group 1; median age 43 years) and 48 patients underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement plus BAV repair (aortic valve reimplantation-Group 2; median age 48 years). Median clinical follow-up time was 5.9 years (range 0.5-15) in Group 1 and 3 years (range 0.5-16) in Group 2, respectively. Results: In-hospital mortality was 1% in Group 1, and 2% in Group 2 (p = .6). The 5- and 10-year survival was 93 +- 2.9% and 81 +- 5.8% in Group 1 and 96 +- 3.1% and 96 +- 3.1% in Group 2, respectively (p = .31). Eleven patients of Group 1 (1.7%/ patient-year) and five patients of Group 2 (2.2%/patient-year) underwent reoperation of the aortic valve (p = .5). The 5- and 10-year freedom from reoperation were 93.0 +- 2.1% and 77.1 +- 7.1% in Group 1 and 93.0 +- 5.0% and 76.7 +- 9.6% in Group 2 (p = .83), respectively. At the latest follow-up, only two patients of Group 1 and 1 patient of Group 2 had AV regurgitation = 2° (p = .7). The cumulative linearized incidence of all valve-related complications (bleeding, stroke, endocarditis, and reoperation) was 2.9%/patient-year in Group 1% and 4%/patient-year in Group 2, respectively (p = .6). Conclusions: Isolated BAV repair and combined aortic valve reimplantation plus BAV repair provide good clinical longer-term outcomes with relatively low reoperation rate and durable valve function.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Cardiac Surgery
ISSN
0886-0440
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
36
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
12
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
4645-4651
Kód UT WoS článku
000697507700001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85115247215