Conceptual Art, Evaluative Experience and Second Nature

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F11%3A10126493" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/11:10126493 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.um.es/vmca/proceedings/docs/48.Jakub-Stejskal.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.um.es/vmca/proceedings/docs/48.Jakub-Stejskal.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Conceptual Art, Evaluative Experience and Second Nature

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In their recent book Who's Afraid of Conceptul Art, Elisabeth Schellekens and Peter Goldie present a philosophical defence of conceptual art as a legitimate art practice with its own merits. They nevertheless acknowledge that conceptual art, despite itsachievements, 'is not wholly successful as art'. It fails to give us 'a sense of our shared humanity in a special [i.e., aesthetic] way, relating what is presented to us to our ethical lives'. '[Good traditional a]rt then presents to us human life and the world in which we live in this special way - as "second nature".' I want to explore this conclusion - and show some limitations thereof - by reconstructing the presuppositions that inform it. First, I briefly present a Kantian inspiration behind it viaa discussion of Anthony Savile's interpretation of Kant's passing remark that producing aesthetic ideas is like creating 'another nature' out of a material provided by first nature. Then, I turn to arguments for a non-projectivist philos

Název v anglickém jazyce

Conceptual Art, Evaluative Experience and Second Nature

Popis výsledku anglicky

In their recent book Who's Afraid of Conceptul Art, Elisabeth Schellekens and Peter Goldie present a philosophical defence of conceptual art as a legitimate art practice with its own merits. They nevertheless acknowledge that conceptual art, despite itsachievements, 'is not wholly successful as art'. It fails to give us 'a sense of our shared humanity in a special [i.e., aesthetic] way, relating what is presented to us to our ethical lives'. '[Good traditional a]rt then presents to us human life and the world in which we live in this special way - as "second nature".' I want to explore this conclusion - and show some limitations thereof - by reconstructing the presuppositions that inform it. First, I briefly present a Kantian inspiration behind it viaa discussion of Anthony Savile's interpretation of Kant's passing remark that producing aesthetic ideas is like creating 'another nature' out of a material provided by first nature. Then, I turn to arguments for a non-projectivist philos

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2011

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Art, Emotion and Value : 5th Mediterranean Congress of Aesthetics

ISBN

978-84-615-7732-3

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

616

Strana od-do

555-562

Název nakladatele

Universidad de Murcia

Místo vydání

Murcia

Místo konání akce

Cartagena, Španělsko

Datum konání akce

4. 7. 2011

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—