Distance and Immersion: Phenomenological Aesthetics and the Question of a 'Paradigm Shift'

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F14%3A10291907" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/14:10291907 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Distance and Immersion: Phenomenological Aesthetics and the Question of a 'Paradigm Shift'

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article is concerned with the question of how two obvious but apparently antithetical features of aesthetic experience - distance and immersion - can be integrated into one theory. The author criticizes the contemporary neglect of the first feature(distance or disinterestedness), and argues for a more dialectical notion of aesthetic experience which would include both of them. To this end, the article starts, in section one, by re-examining the main points in the evolution of phenomenological aesthetics, which some authors consider a chief source of this neglect. The presence of two questions is emphasized: (1) the idea of a distinctive perception which we traditionally call aesthetic and can trace back to Kantian roots and (2) the process of breaking with the subject-object model of experience. In the end of this section, the question is raised whether the successful elimination of the latter means the necessary rejection of the former. In section two, the author argues for a ne

Název v anglickém jazyce

Distance and Immersion: Phenomenological Aesthetics and the Question of a 'Paradigm Shift'

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article is concerned with the question of how two obvious but apparently antithetical features of aesthetic experience - distance and immersion - can be integrated into one theory. The author criticizes the contemporary neglect of the first feature(distance or disinterestedness), and argues for a more dialectical notion of aesthetic experience which would include both of them. To this end, the article starts, in section one, by re-examining the main points in the evolution of phenomenological aesthetics, which some authors consider a chief source of this neglect. The presence of two questions is emphasized: (1) the idea of a distinctive perception which we traditionally call aesthetic and can trace back to Kantian roots and (2) the process of breaking with the subject-object model of experience. In the end of this section, the question is raised whether the successful elimination of the latter means the necessary rejection of the former. In section two, the author argues for a ne

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GAP409%2F11%2F0324" target="_blank" >GAP409/11/0324: Problematika umění v myšlení Jana Patočky</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2014

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Philosophica et Historica

ISSN

0567-8293

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2014

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

31-46

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—