Logicism as making Arithmetic Explicit
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F15%3A10291166" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/15:10291166 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10670-014-9712-z" target="_blank" >http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10670-014-9712-z</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9712-z" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10670-014-9712-z</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Logicism as making Arithmetic Explicit
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper aims to shed light on the broader significance of Frege's logicism (and hence the phenomenon of modern logic) against the background of discussing and comparing Wittgenstein's 'showing/saying'-distinction with Brandom's idiom of logic as the enterprise of making the implicit rules of our linguistic practices (something we do) explicit (by something we say). The main thesis of this paper is that the problem of Frege's logicism lies deeper than in its inconsistency (which has since turned out to be reparable, as the neologicists have shown): it lies in the basic idea that in arithmetic (and prospectively in language in general) one can, and should, express everything that is implicitly presupposed so that nothing is left unsaid. This, in fact,is the target of Wittgenstein's critique. Rather than the Tractatus, with its claim that logicism attempts to say something that can only be shown (e.g. what 'object', 'function' or 'number' are), it is the Philosophical Investigations,
Název v anglickém jazyce
Logicism as making Arithmetic Explicit
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper aims to shed light on the broader significance of Frege's logicism (and hence the phenomenon of modern logic) against the background of discussing and comparing Wittgenstein's 'showing/saying'-distinction with Brandom's idiom of logic as the enterprise of making the implicit rules of our linguistic practices (something we do) explicit (by something we say). The main thesis of this paper is that the problem of Frege's logicism lies deeper than in its inconsistency (which has since turned out to be reparable, as the neologicists have shown): it lies in the basic idea that in arithmetic (and prospectively in language in general) one can, and should, express everything that is implicitly presupposed so that nothing is left unsaid. This, in fact,is the target of Wittgenstein's critique. Rather than the Tractatus, with its claim that logicism attempts to say something that can only be shown (e.g. what 'object', 'function' or 'number' are), it is the Philosophical Investigations,
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AA - Filosofie a náboženství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GAP401%2F11%2F0371" target="_blank" >GAP401/11/0371: Apriorní, syntetické a analytické od středověku po současnou filozofii</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Erkenntnis
ISSN
0165-0106
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
80
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
17
Strana od-do
487-503
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—