Theory of metaphor and aspect seeing
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F18%3A10382291" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/18:10382291 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=707314" target="_blank" >https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=707314</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Theory of metaphor and aspect seeing
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The present paper aims at elucidating the conceptual architecture of Marcus B. Hester's theory of metaphor. This theory is fundamentally based on Ludwig Wittgenstein's analysis of aspect perception (as appeared in the eleventh section of his Philosophical Investigations). On the one hand, Hester's theory is worth noticing for the emphasis it gives to imagination (or quasi-perceptual experience) in the process of appreciating metaphorical statements; on the other hand, however, it does not properly interpret the chosen Wittgensteinian inspiration. Its main shortcoming, as I try to show, is that Hester does not pay adequate attention to Wittgenstein's distinction between the experience of noticing an aspect (so called "aspect-dawning") and continuous aspect perception. This flaw then results in such an account of metaphor that actually does not make room for aesthetic value of metaphorical statements. Such a result would be unacceptable for Hester himself, since poetic metaphor was in the centre of his attention, but the problematic assumptions responsible for it went unnoticed by him.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Theory of metaphor and aspect seeing
Popis výsledku anglicky
The present paper aims at elucidating the conceptual architecture of Marcus B. Hester's theory of metaphor. This theory is fundamentally based on Ludwig Wittgenstein's analysis of aspect perception (as appeared in the eleventh section of his Philosophical Investigations). On the one hand, Hester's theory is worth noticing for the emphasis it gives to imagination (or quasi-perceptual experience) in the process of appreciating metaphorical statements; on the other hand, however, it does not properly interpret the chosen Wittgensteinian inspiration. Its main shortcoming, as I try to show, is that Hester does not pay adequate attention to Wittgenstein's distinction between the experience of noticing an aspect (so called "aspect-dawning") and continuous aspect perception. This flaw then results in such an account of metaphor that actually does not make room for aesthetic value of metaphorical statements. Such a result would be unacceptable for Hester himself, since poetic metaphor was in the centre of his attention, but the problematic assumptions responsible for it went unnoticed by him.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60400 - Arts (arts, history of arts, performing arts, music)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
World Literature Studies
ISSN
1337-9275
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
10
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
104-113
Kód UT WoS článku
000449580600008
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—