Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Socratic Voices in Derrida's Writing

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F19%3A10400827" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/19:10400827 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004396753_037" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004396753_037</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004396753_037" target="_blank" >10.1163/9789004396753_037</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Socratic Voices in Derrida's Writing

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Starting with Grammatology (1967), Derrida recurs to the Socrates of Plato&apos;s dialogue as a spokesman of the living voice, a philosopher who not only criticizes writing for its incapacity to co-operate in revealing its intended sense, but is himself, in his activity, resistant to the rigid protocols of all written record. On the other side, as Derrida points out in Voice and Phenomenon (1967), it is the same Socrates who enacts the original &quot;decision of philosophy in its Platonic form&quot; by insisting on the necessary fixity of true definitions and their objects. Hence the obvious tension arises: how, on Socrates&apos; own criteria, could definitions not be fully recordable, how could they escape a repeatable fixation independent of whether they are written down or transmitted in a spoken dialogue? In Dissemination with its more developed but also more varied treatment of Socrates (1972), Derrida makes this tension into something stranger and richer: Socrates now takes on his many colors whose mixture cannot be resolved into simple polarities of voice and written word or presence and absence. The chapter revisits this strangeness, which is proper to the most singular man who nevertheless says always the same things about the same matters (Gorgias 490e), in the light of both Derrida&apos;s writings and Plato&apos;s dialogues including the Apology, Phaedrus, Symposium and Philebus. It concludes that, far from using Socrates as a prop for his alleged rejection of logocentrism, Derrida tends to appropriate Socratic motifs for subtler ends.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Socratic Voices in Derrida's Writing

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Starting with Grammatology (1967), Derrida recurs to the Socrates of Plato&apos;s dialogue as a spokesman of the living voice, a philosopher who not only criticizes writing for its incapacity to co-operate in revealing its intended sense, but is himself, in his activity, resistant to the rigid protocols of all written record. On the other side, as Derrida points out in Voice and Phenomenon (1967), it is the same Socrates who enacts the original &quot;decision of philosophy in its Platonic form&quot; by insisting on the necessary fixity of true definitions and their objects. Hence the obvious tension arises: how, on Socrates&apos; own criteria, could definitions not be fully recordable, how could they escape a repeatable fixation independent of whether they are written down or transmitted in a spoken dialogue? In Dissemination with its more developed but also more varied treatment of Socrates (1972), Derrida makes this tension into something stranger and richer: Socrates now takes on his many colors whose mixture cannot be resolved into simple polarities of voice and written word or presence and absence. The chapter revisits this strangeness, which is proper to the most singular man who nevertheless says always the same things about the same matters (Gorgias 490e), in the light of both Derrida&apos;s writings and Plato&apos;s dialogues including the Apology, Phaedrus, Symposium and Philebus. It concludes that, far from using Socrates as a prop for his alleged rejection of logocentrism, Derrida tends to appropriate Socratic motifs for subtler ends.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/EF16_019%2F0000734" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000734: Kreativita a adaptabilita jako předpoklad úspěchu Evropy v propojeném světě</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates

  • ISBN

    978-90-04-39675-3

  • Počet stran výsledku

    25

  • Strana od-do

    950-974

  • Počet stran knihy

    1028

  • Název nakladatele

    Brill

  • Místo vydání

    Leiden

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly