On the Czech Translation of Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F20%3A10423469" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/20:10423469 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=yJe9aMnjkB" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=yJe9aMnjkB</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

On the Czech Translation of Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Simone de Beauvoir&apos;s The Second Sex was translated into Czech in 1966. This was the first translation of the book to be published in a socialist state. As with many other translations during this period it was a compilation of selections, edited by the phenomenologist Jan Patočka, who in his postscript presented the book primarily within its philosophical context. The book, which was published in three editions within two years and reached a circulation of almost one hundred thousand, reaped substantial acclaim both among the lay and academic public. The main debate about the book unfolded in the journal Literární noviny and Vlasta magazine, in which the contributors aired their views on the book from various ideological positions - phenomenology, Marxism, view of the women&apos;s press.

Název v anglickém jazyce

On the Czech Translation of Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex

Popis výsledku anglicky

Simone de Beauvoir&apos;s The Second Sex was translated into Czech in 1966. This was the first translation of the book to be published in a socialist state. As with many other translations during this period it was a compilation of selections, edited by the phenomenologist Jan Patočka, who in his postscript presented the book primarily within its philosophical context. The book, which was published in three editions within two years and reached a circulation of almost one hundred thousand, reaped substantial acclaim both among the lay and academic public. The main debate about the book unfolded in the journal Literární noviny and Vlasta magazine, in which the contributors aired their views on the book from various ideological positions - phenomenology, Marxism, view of the women&apos;s press.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60401 - Arts, Art history

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Kontradikce

ISSN

2570-7485

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

4

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

32

Strana od-do

155-186

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—