Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

How to Think about Liberal and Democratic Principles: Three Models of Illiberal Democracy

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11210%2F24%3A10485798" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11210/24:10485798 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=9rdztpHBfF" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=9rdztpHBfF</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.46854/fc.2024.1s13" target="_blank" >10.46854/fc.2024.1s13</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    How to Think about Liberal and Democratic Principles: Three Models of Illiberal Democracy

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This article aims to examine how to think about illiberal democracy which is a threat democracy is currently facing. In some detail, three models of democracy are analysed, which differ in how they understand the relationship between liberal and democratic principles, likewise demonstrating what conception they have of illiberal democracy. First of these is Schumpeter&apos;s theory of competitive democracy, which seeks the liberal taming of democracy. Second, Schmitt&apos;s argument that liberal and democratic principles are contradictory, and third, Urbinati&apos;s theory of democracy, which acknowledges their inner coherence. Urbinati, however, rejects the concept of illiberal democracy as an oxymoron. Thus, this article also examines how illiberal democracy could be meaningfully and with some theoretical advantages considered, even within the framework of the internal coherence of both principles. In such a case, illiberal democracy will refer to the systematic effort to weaken liberal principles in the process of the formation of political will and public opinion in a democratic setting, thus bringing the regime at the edge of an authoritarian one. It shows the point where democracy ends.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    How to Think about Liberal and Democratic Principles: Three Models of Illiberal Democracy

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This article aims to examine how to think about illiberal democracy which is a threat democracy is currently facing. In some detail, three models of democracy are analysed, which differ in how they understand the relationship between liberal and democratic principles, likewise demonstrating what conception they have of illiberal democracy. First of these is Schumpeter&apos;s theory of competitive democracy, which seeks the liberal taming of democracy. Second, Schmitt&apos;s argument that liberal and democratic principles are contradictory, and third, Urbinati&apos;s theory of democracy, which acknowledges their inner coherence. Urbinati, however, rejects the concept of illiberal democracy as an oxymoron. Thus, this article also examines how illiberal democracy could be meaningfully and with some theoretical advantages considered, even within the framework of the internal coherence of both principles. In such a case, illiberal democracy will refer to the systematic effort to weaken liberal principles in the process of the formation of political will and public opinion in a democratic setting, thus bringing the regime at the edge of an authoritarian one. It shows the point where democracy ends.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50601 - Political science

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2024

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Filosofický časopis

  • ISSN

    0015-1831

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    72

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CZ - Česká republika

  • Počet stran výsledku

    17

  • Strana od-do

    13-29

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001273276400002

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus