What Czech Judges Can and Cannot Do? Practice of Judicial Dispiplinary Authorities in the Czech Republic: Empirical Analyses of All Disciplinary Decisions between 2008 and 2014

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F16%3A10327054" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/16:10327054 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

What Czech Judges Can and Cannot Do? Practice of Judicial Dispiplinary Authorities in the Czech Republic: Empirical Analyses of All Disciplinary Decisions between 2008 and 2014

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article analyses all judicial disciplinary decisions issued by the disciplinary court in the Czech Republic since 2008, when the reform of the disciplinary court took place. The authors, after introducing the Czech disciplinary system, describe the conduct of the judges, which were found inappropriate by the court. In the second part of the paper they offer an analysis of the cases tried by the disciplinary court, in which the court found no substantial breach of the standards of professional judicial ethics or which were suspended before reaching a decision. In the last part of the paper, the authors summarize their findings, offer their interpretation and place their findings in a broader Czech context. The article thus offers an overview of the most recent practice of the Czech disciplinary court, which may be used for international comparison with the judicial disciplinary practice in other states.

Název v anglickém jazyce

What Czech Judges Can and Cannot Do? Practice of Judicial Dispiplinary Authorities in the Czech Republic: Empirical Analyses of All Disciplinary Decisions between 2008 and 2014

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article analyses all judicial disciplinary decisions issued by the disciplinary court in the Czech Republic since 2008, when the reform of the disciplinary court took place. The authors, after introducing the Czech disciplinary system, describe the conduct of the judges, which were found inappropriate by the court. In the second part of the paper they offer an analysis of the cases tried by the disciplinary court, in which the court found no substantial breach of the standards of professional judicial ethics or which were suspended before reaching a decision. In the last part of the paper, the authors summarize their findings, offer their interpretation and place their findings in a broader Czech context. The article thus offers an overview of the most recent practice of the Czech disciplinary court, which may be used for international comparison with the judicial disciplinary practice in other states.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AG - Právní vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Asian Journal of Legal Education

ISSN

2322-0058

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

3

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

IN - Indická republika

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

22-37

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—