An Ethically Indifferent Code of Ethics? Analysis of the Character of the Czech Bar Association's Code of Ethics
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F23%3A10465086" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/23:10465086 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=qbZQoUApxI" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=qbZQoUApxI</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
An Ethically Indifferent Code of Ethics? Analysis of the Character of the Czech Bar Association's Code of Ethics
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The Czech Bar Association published a text which has the words "code of ethics" in its title. The aim of this paper is to determine whether the norms contained in the code are actually related to ethics or whether they concern different fields. The paper first explains the raison d'être of codes of ethics in general and briefly introduces the Czech Bar Association and the origin of its code of ethics. The principal section of the paper is dedicated to a detailed analysis of the text of the Czech Bar Association's code of ethics applying a method used in England for similar purposes by Donald Nicolson. The analysis shows that the Czech Bar Association's code of ethics deals with ethical issues only to a lesser extent and that it contains numerous provisions which do not deal with ethics at all. The paper proposes to remedy this unsuitable state by creating two separate codes. The first would primarily regulate ethically relevant situations in legal practice. The other code would contain "other" rules of the profession.
Název v anglickém jazyce
An Ethically Indifferent Code of Ethics? Analysis of the Character of the Czech Bar Association's Code of Ethics
Popis výsledku anglicky
The Czech Bar Association published a text which has the words "code of ethics" in its title. The aim of this paper is to determine whether the norms contained in the code are actually related to ethics or whether they concern different fields. The paper first explains the raison d'être of codes of ethics in general and briefly introduces the Czech Bar Association and the origin of its code of ethics. The principal section of the paper is dedicated to a detailed analysis of the text of the Czech Bar Association's code of ethics applying a method used in England for similar purposes by Donald Nicolson. The analysis shows that the Czech Bar Association's code of ethics deals with ethical issues only to a lesser extent and that it contains numerous provisions which do not deal with ethics at all. The paper proposes to remedy this unsuitable state by creating two separate codes. The first would primarily regulate ethically relevant situations in legal practice. The other code would contain "other" rules of the profession.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Iuridica
ISSN
0323-0619
e-ISSN
2336-6478
Svazek periodika
69
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
155-169
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85164660084