Changing Forms of Maximalism in the Decision-Making of the Czech Constitutional Court

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F23%3A10472898" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/23:10472898 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=pExEntXu2E" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=pExEntXu2E</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Changing Forms of Maximalism in the Decision-Making of the Czech Constitutional Court

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article analyses how wide and general conclusions are formulated in case law, using a sample of decisions of the Czech Constitutional Court from 1998 and 2018. The article shows tendencies towards institutionalisation of maximalist decision-making in the form of formulating general principles as starting points for decisions made in individual cases. Another important observation is connected with the changing form of maximalist judicial decisions, shifting from maximalism characterised by depth of the reasoning towards maximalism manifested in the width of impacts of an individual case, whereby the Czech Constitutional Court has been strengthening its position vis-a-vis other branches of government. In the conclusion of the article, it is emphasised that maximalism, in terms of separation of powers, rather represents an anti-systemic element in the laws of countries with civil-law legal system, such as the Czech Republic.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Changing Forms of Maximalism in the Decision-Making of the Czech Constitutional Court

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article analyses how wide and general conclusions are formulated in case law, using a sample of decisions of the Czech Constitutional Court from 1998 and 2018. The article shows tendencies towards institutionalisation of maximalist decision-making in the form of formulating general principles as starting points for decisions made in individual cases. Another important observation is connected with the changing form of maximalist judicial decisions, shifting from maximalism characterised by depth of the reasoning towards maximalism manifested in the width of impacts of an individual case, whereby the Czech Constitutional Court has been strengthening its position vis-a-vis other branches of government. In the conclusion of the article, it is emphasised that maximalism, in terms of separation of powers, rather represents an anti-systemic element in the laws of countries with civil-law legal system, such as the Czech Republic.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-10723S" target="_blank" >GA19-10723S: Co současné právo sjednocuje a co jej fragmentarizuje z pohledu právní teorie a soudní praxe?</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Review of Central and East European Law

ISSN

0925-9880

e-ISSN

1573-0352

Svazek periodika

48

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3-4

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

34

Strana od-do

241-274

Kód UT WoS článku

001167523600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—