On the erosion of the limits of the direct effect of EU Directives

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F24%3A10490703" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/24:10490703 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ZU31w_EvF3" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=ZU31w_EvF3</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

On the erosion of the limits of the direct effect of EU Directives

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article identifies and assesses the different ways in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has eroded its own general limits of the direct effect of EU directives. The article argues that while these different ways of erosion extend the admissibility of the direct effect of EU directives, they do so at the cost of significantly weakening legal certainty of the persons concerned, making these erosions highly questionable. The article highlights and criticises the most questionable form of such erosion, that emanating from the Mangold and Kücükdeveci line of case law of the CJEU. The article concludes that an adequate response to these questionable erosions should not be the acceptance of a general admissibility of the horizontal direct effect of EU directives. Rather, the response should be based on various efforts to reduce the occurrence of situations of improper transposition of EU directives - the main trigger for the direct effect of EU directives. These efforts should be accompanied by a comprehensive review of the Mangold and Kücükdeveci line of case law and a further clarification by the CJEU of the limits of the (in)admissibility of the direct effect of EU directives, which would considerably increase legal certainty for the persons concerned.

Název v anglickém jazyce

On the erosion of the limits of the direct effect of EU Directives

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article identifies and assesses the different ways in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has eroded its own general limits of the direct effect of EU directives. The article argues that while these different ways of erosion extend the admissibility of the direct effect of EU directives, they do so at the cost of significantly weakening legal certainty of the persons concerned, making these erosions highly questionable. The article highlights and criticises the most questionable form of such erosion, that emanating from the Mangold and Kücükdeveci line of case law of the CJEU. The article concludes that an adequate response to these questionable erosions should not be the acceptance of a general admissibility of the horizontal direct effect of EU directives. Rather, the response should be based on various efforts to reduce the occurrence of situations of improper transposition of EU directives - the main trigger for the direct effect of EU directives. These efforts should be accompanied by a comprehensive review of the Mangold and Kücükdeveci line of case law and a further clarification by the CJEU of the limits of the (in)admissibility of the direct effect of EU directives, which would considerably increase legal certainty for the persons concerned.

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Lawyer Quarterly

ISSN

1805-8396

e-ISSN

1805-840X

Svazek periodika

2024

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

30-38

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85188708179