Sports arbitration, doping and the GDPR: Tightening the judicial independence of non-judicial bodies in NADA and Others
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11220%2F25%3A10498946" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11220/25:10498946 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=x8AZbx84ji" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=x8AZbx84ji</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Sports arbitration, doping and the GDPR: Tightening the judicial independence of non-judicial bodies in NADA and Others
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This case note examines the Grand Chamber judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-115/22, NADA and Others, marking the first preliminary reference made by a sports arbitration body. The case concerned the compatibility of Austria's mandatory public disclosure of anti-doping sanctions with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The CJEU declared the request inadmissible, holding that the Austrian Independent Arbitration Committee (USK) lacked sufficient independence to qualify as a "court or tribunal" under Article 267 TFEU. This judgment reflects a broader recalibration of the CJEU's independence standards in light of the EU's rule of law crisis, particularly the irremovability requirement. Beyond the procedural dimension, the case reopens debates on whether anti-doping rules fall within the scope of EU law. Contrary to the Advocate General's view, this note argues that anti-doping rules-given their economic implications-engage the GDPR. The CJEU's evolving scrutiny of sports arbitration, as evidenced by ISU v Commission and Royal Football Club Seraing, affirms the need for national courts to ensure such arbitration complies with EU law.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Sports arbitration, doping and the GDPR: Tightening the judicial independence of non-judicial bodies in NADA and Others
Popis výsledku anglicky
This case note examines the Grand Chamber judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-115/22, NADA and Others, marking the first preliminary reference made by a sports arbitration body. The case concerned the compatibility of Austria's mandatory public disclosure of anti-doping sanctions with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The CJEU declared the request inadmissible, holding that the Austrian Independent Arbitration Committee (USK) lacked sufficient independence to qualify as a "court or tribunal" under Article 267 TFEU. This judgment reflects a broader recalibration of the CJEU's independence standards in light of the EU's rule of law crisis, particularly the irremovability requirement. Beyond the procedural dimension, the case reopens debates on whether anti-doping rules fall within the scope of EU law. Contrary to the Advocate General's view, this note argues that anti-doping rules-given their economic implications-engage the GDPR. The CJEU's evolving scrutiny of sports arbitration, as evidenced by ISU v Commission and Royal Football Club Seraing, affirms the need for national courts to ensure such arbitration complies with EU law.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Common Market Law Review
ISSN
0165-0750
e-ISSN
1875-8320
Svazek periodika
62
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
22
Strana od-do
933-954
Kód UT WoS článku
001532295000008
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—