Form follows function: Reopening of judicial proceedings and EU law in Profi Credit Polska

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F24%3A00137773" target="_blank" >RIV/00216224:14220/24:00137773 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/61.6/COLA2024106" target="_blank" >https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/61.6/COLA2024106</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/cola2024106" target="_blank" >10.54648/cola2024106</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Form follows function: Reopening of judicial proceedings and EU law in Profi Credit Polska

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article examines the Court of Justice of the European Union's (CJEU) judgment in the Profi Credit Polska case (C-582/21), which addresses the reopening of judicial proceedings to ensure the correct application of EU law. The case highlights the tension between the primacy of EU law and the procedural autonomy of Member States. It explores the challenges national courts face in balancing procedural requirements with the need to provide effective legal protection under EU law, particularly in consumer protection cases. The judgment underscores the importance of national courts' proactive role in examining the fairness of contractual terms ex officio and the conditions under which closed cases may be reopened. The article also discusses the implications of the judgment for the principle of res judicata and the broader context of judicial cooperation within the EU legal framework.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Form follows function: Reopening of judicial proceedings and EU law in Profi Credit Polska

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article examines the Court of Justice of the European Union's (CJEU) judgment in the Profi Credit Polska case (C-582/21), which addresses the reopening of judicial proceedings to ensure the correct application of EU law. The case highlights the tension between the primacy of EU law and the procedural autonomy of Member States. It explores the challenges national courts face in balancing procedural requirements with the need to provide effective legal protection under EU law, particularly in consumer protection cases. The judgment underscores the importance of national courts' proactive role in examining the fairness of contractual terms ex officio and the conditions under which closed cases may be reopened. The article also discusses the implications of the judgment for the principle of res judicata and the broader context of judicial cooperation within the EU legal framework.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Common Market Law Review

ISSN

0165-0750

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

61

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

16

Strana od-do

1645-1660

Kód UT WoS článku

001415820600009

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85211136041