Benchmarking as a substitute for the market mechanism: Empirical evidence for the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F15%3A10312194" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/15:10312194 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01273-3" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01273-3</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01273-3" target="_blank" >10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01273-3</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Benchmarking as a substitute for the market mechanism: Empirical evidence for the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Benchmarking is most often referred to as a tool for the improvement of processes and performance of organizations. Therefore, it was also in the framework of reforms in the spirit of New Public Management which was implemented in the public sector. Regarding the theory of benchmarking, many authors have pointed out that in addition to the actual improvement of processes, benchmarking can replace the function of the market mechanism in the allocation of public funds among organizations that provide public goods and services, which often operate in a monopolistic environment. Empirically, this has been observed in so-called ""pure"" NPM countries like the UK, USA, and New Zealand. The aim of this article is to describe the use of benchmarking in the public sector, focusing specifically on the case of municipalities in the Czech Republic, where as a result of the initial conditions, the phenomenon of ""voting by feet"" does not work and the effect of competition is severely restricted. B

Název v anglickém jazyce

Benchmarking as a substitute for the market mechanism: Empirical evidence for the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

Benchmarking is most often referred to as a tool for the improvement of processes and performance of organizations. Therefore, it was also in the framework of reforms in the spirit of New Public Management which was implemented in the public sector. Regarding the theory of benchmarking, many authors have pointed out that in addition to the actual improvement of processes, benchmarking can replace the function of the market mechanism in the allocation of public funds among organizations that provide public goods and services, which often operate in a monopolistic environment. Empirically, this has been observed in so-called ""pure"" NPM countries like the UK, USA, and New Zealand. The aim of this article is to describe the use of benchmarking in the public sector, focusing specifically on the case of municipalities in the Czech Republic, where as a result of the initial conditions, the phenomenon of ""voting by feet"" does not work and the effect of competition is severely restricted. B

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AH - Ekonomie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

IISES 3rd and 4th Economics and Finance Conference

ISBN

—

ISSN

2212-5671

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

606-612

Název nakladatele

Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 30

Místo vydání

Rome

Místo konání akce

Rome

Datum konání akce

14. 4. 2015

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—