Definice, příčiny a důsledky kumulace mandátů zákonodárci

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F16%3A10329445" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/16:10329445 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://journals.muni.cz/cepsr/article/view/6237/5598" target="_blank" >https://journals.muni.cz/cepsr/article/view/6237/5598</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CEPSR.2016.23.141" target="_blank" >10.5817/CEPSR.2016.23.141</a>

Jazyk výsledku

čeština

Název v původním jazyce

Definice, příčiny a důsledky kumulace mandátů zákonodárci

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article deals with various aspects of multiple-office holding. Although the phenomenon is especially influential in connection with legislators, the text offers a critical synthesis of recent findings on multiple-office holding on any level of political decision-making, thus providing a general framework for scholarly discussion and further research. The paper first provides a definition of the concept of multiple-office holding, which has been heretofore lacking in the Czech context. Causes of multiple-office holding are then delineated and divided into the three categories of historical reverberations, systemic elements and individual incentives. Both the positive and negative impacts on a political system are discussed as well. Next, three approaches (direct, indirect, and autoregulatory) of dealing with the practice of multiple-office holding, which are employed by particular political systems, are distinguished. Then, the role of a multiple-office holding in the Czech political system is depicted. The final part of the paper discusses a specific controversy linked to the phenomenon and criticises the lack of proper debates and scientific analyses on the practice.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Definition, Causes, and Impacts of Multiple-Office Holding by Legislators

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article deals with various aspects of multiple-office holding. Although the phenomenon is especially influential in connection with legislators, the text offers a critical synthesis of recent findings on multiple-office holding on any level of political decision-making, thus providing a general framework for scholarly discussion and further research. The paper first provides a definition of the concept of multiple-office holding, which has been heretofore lacking in the Czech context. Causes of multiple-office holding are then delineated and divided into the three categories of historical reverberations, systemic elements and individual incentives. Both the positive and negative impacts on a political system are discussed as well. Next, three approaches (direct, indirect, and autoregulatory) of dealing with the practice of multiple-office holding, which are employed by particular political systems, are distinguished. Then, the role of a multiple-office holding in the Czech political system is depicted. The final part of the paper discusses a specific controversy linked to the phenomenon and criticises the lack of proper debates and scientific analyses on the practice.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AD - Politologie a politické vědy

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Středoevropské politické studie (Central European Political Studies Review.)

ISSN

1213-2691

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

18

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2-3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

30

Strana od-do

141-170

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—