The Marginalized Democracies of the World
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F21%3A10438046" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/21:10438046 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=y0ZlVdthtb" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=y0ZlVdthtb</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/dt.2021.080201" target="_blank" >10.3167/dt.2021.080201</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Marginalized Democracies of the World
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This introductory article to Democratic Theory's special issue on the marginalized democracies of the world begins by presenting the lexical method for understanding democracy. It is argued that the lexical method is better than the normative and analytical methods at finding democracies in the world. The argument then turns to demonstrating, mainly through computational research conducted within the Google Books catalog, that an empirically demonstrable imbalance exists between the democracies mentioned in the literature. The remainder of the argument is given to explaining the value of working to correct this imbalance, which comes in at least three guises: (1) studying marginalized democracies can increase our options for alternative democratic actions and democratic innovations; (2) it leads to a conservation and public outreach project, which is epitomized in an "encyclopedia of the democracies"; and (3) it advocates for a decolonization of democracies' definitions and practices and decentering academic democratic theory.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Marginalized Democracies of the World
Popis výsledku anglicky
This introductory article to Democratic Theory's special issue on the marginalized democracies of the world begins by presenting the lexical method for understanding democracy. It is argued that the lexical method is better than the normative and analytical methods at finding democracies in the world. The argument then turns to demonstrating, mainly through computational research conducted within the Google Books catalog, that an empirically demonstrable imbalance exists between the democracies mentioned in the literature. The remainder of the argument is given to explaining the value of working to correct this imbalance, which comes in at least three guises: (1) studying marginalized democracies can increase our options for alternative democratic actions and democratic innovations; (2) it leads to a conservation and public outreach project, which is epitomized in an "encyclopedia of the democracies"; and (3) it advocates for a decolonization of democracies' definitions and practices and decentering academic democratic theory.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Democratic Theory
ISSN
2332-8894
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
8
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
1-18
Kód UT WoS článku
000740948800001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85123550785