Limits of the Rule of Law: Negotiating Afghan "Traditional" Law in the International Civil Trials in the Czech Republic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F21%3A10467302" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/21:10467302 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=-Dwqq8dSgv" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=-Dwqq8dSgv</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Limits of the Rule of Law: Negotiating Afghan "Traditional" Law in the International Civil Trials in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Drawing on ethnographic research of judicial cases in the Czech Republic which involve the law inmigrants&apos; countries of origin, this Article outlines how multiple strategies handle encounters with thelegal-cultural differences of Afghanistan in order to neutralize what may be called the &quot;alterity&quot; oflaw. The Article suggests that far from being analytical tools, concepts such as &quot;context,&quot; &quot;culture,&quot;and &quot;customary&quot; are strategically used by courts to neutralize unsettling aspects of foreign Afghanlegalities. Further, it applies Leopold Pospisil&apos;s ethnological concept of legal authority as a vehicle forreinterpreting the contextual differentiation of Afghan &quot;traditional&quot; law as an alternative to thestandard judicial approach. Lastly, this Article suggests that the legal-cultural differences in this andsimilar cases can be bridged by a new concept of legal sodality, which offers an anthropologization oflegal authorities&apos; distinctive manner of imagining the law of the others.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Limits of the Rule of Law: Negotiating Afghan "Traditional" Law in the International Civil Trials in the Czech Republic

Popis výsledku anglicky

Drawing on ethnographic research of judicial cases in the Czech Republic which involve the law inmigrants&apos; countries of origin, this Article outlines how multiple strategies handle encounters with thelegal-cultural differences of Afghanistan in order to neutralize what may be called the &quot;alterity&quot; oflaw. The Article suggests that far from being analytical tools, concepts such as &quot;context,&quot; &quot;culture,&quot;and &quot;customary&quot; are strategically used by courts to neutralize unsettling aspects of foreign Afghanlegalities. Further, it applies Leopold Pospisil&apos;s ethnological concept of legal authority as a vehicle forreinterpreting the contextual differentiation of Afghan &quot;traditional&quot; law as an alternative to thestandard judicial approach. Lastly, this Article suggests that the legal-cultural differences in this andsimilar cases can be bridged by a new concept of legal sodality, which offers an anthropologization oflegal authorities&apos; distinctive manner of imagining the law of the others.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50404 - Anthropology, ethnology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA18-23993S" target="_blank" >GA18-23993S: Kulturní podmíněnost moderního přístupu k právní jinakosti: etnologická perspektiva.</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

ISSN

0090-2594

e-ISSN

2831-8633

Svazek periodika

54

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

39

Strana od-do

1123-1161

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—