Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Who Owns The Ukrainian State? Tensions between the People and the Elites After 1991

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11230%2F22%3A10470750" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11230/22:10470750 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.13173/9783447117715.025" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.13173/9783447117715.025</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13173/9783447117715.025" target="_blank" >10.13173/9783447117715.025</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Who Owns The Ukrainian State? Tensions between the People and the Elites After 1991

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    This research examines the post-1991 history of Ukraine through tensions between its people and the elites, which carves out space for an examination of the political agency of the people, subsequently re-imagined as populus, demos, and plebs. Acemoglu andRobinson&apos;s framework (2019) that defines a political regime through relations between a state and a society stands as a conceptual backbone of the present study. It is complemented with a political rendering of Albert O. Hirschman&apos;s approach (1970) to explicate the main strategies of political action Ukrainians lean upon. Several ideal-typical settings are distinguished and described: 1) &apos;Potemkin democracy&apos;, referring to patronal politics with disempowered people falling back on the &apos;exit&apos;strategy, interpreted as migration, curtailed reproduction, and disengagement from the political sphere; 2) &apos;radical democracy&apos;, in which people resort to mass protests in order to acquire a &apos;voice&apos;in strategic decision-making; 3) &apos;ocular democracy&apos;, in which people form the audience in a political theatre, defined through their &apos;loyalty&apos;to a leader as their political &apos;trustee&apos;, with social media presence and sociological polls acting as feedback loops.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Who Owns The Ukrainian State? Tensions between the People and the Elites After 1991

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    This research examines the post-1991 history of Ukraine through tensions between its people and the elites, which carves out space for an examination of the political agency of the people, subsequently re-imagined as populus, demos, and plebs. Acemoglu andRobinson&apos;s framework (2019) that defines a political regime through relations between a state and a society stands as a conceptual backbone of the present study. It is complemented with a political rendering of Albert O. Hirschman&apos;s approach (1970) to explicate the main strategies of political action Ukrainians lean upon. Several ideal-typical settings are distinguished and described: 1) &apos;Potemkin democracy&apos;, referring to patronal politics with disempowered people falling back on the &apos;exit&apos;strategy, interpreted as migration, curtailed reproduction, and disengagement from the political sphere; 2) &apos;radical democracy&apos;, in which people resort to mass protests in order to acquire a &apos;voice&apos;in strategic decision-making; 3) &apos;ocular democracy&apos;, in which people form the audience in a political theatre, defined through their &apos;loyalty&apos;to a leader as their political &apos;trustee&apos;, with social media presence and sociological polls acting as feedback loops.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50601 - Political science

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    Analyzing conflict settings. Case studies from Eastern Europe with a focus on Ukraine.

  • ISBN

    978-3-447-11771-5

  • Počet stran výsledku

    20

  • Strana od-do

    25-44

  • Počet stran knihy

    333

  • Název nakladatele

    Harrassowitz Verlag

  • Místo vydání

    Wiesbaden

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly