Social Space and the Question of Objectivity

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F17%3A10368235" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/17:10368235 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/gth-2017-0018" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/gth-2017-0018</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/gth-2017-0018" target="_blank" >10.1515/gth-2017-0018</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Social Space and the Question of Objectivity

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In speaking of the social dimensions of human experience, we inevitably become involved in the debate regarding how they are to be studied. Should we embrace the first-person perspective, which is that of the phenomenologists, and begin with the experiences composing our directly experienced lifeworld? Alternately, should we follow the lead of natural scientists and take up the third-person perspective? This is the perspective that asserts that we must begin with what is true for everyone, i.e., with what is available to both me and Others (the &quot;they&quot; that forms the grammatical third person). Both perspectives are one sided in that each presupposes the other for its intelligibility. The third-person perspective is Cartesian and, as I show, privileges space, while the first-person perspective is social in Levinas&apos;s sense and presupposes time. Our reality, I argue, embraces both perspectives and is, in fact, set by their intertwining.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Social Space and the Question of Objectivity

Popis výsledku anglicky

In speaking of the social dimensions of human experience, we inevitably become involved in the debate regarding how they are to be studied. Should we embrace the first-person perspective, which is that of the phenomenologists, and begin with the experiences composing our directly experienced lifeworld? Alternately, should we follow the lead of natural scientists and take up the third-person perspective? This is the perspective that asserts that we must begin with what is true for everyone, i.e., with what is available to both me and Others (the &quot;they&quot; that forms the grammatical third person). Both perspectives are one sided in that each presupposes the other for its intelligibility. The third-person perspective is Cartesian and, as I show, privileges space, while the first-person perspective is social in Levinas&apos;s sense and presupposes time. Our reality, I argue, embraces both perspectives and is, in fact, set by their intertwining.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Gestalt Theory

ISSN

2519-5808

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

39

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2-3

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

249-262

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—