Phenomenology and Aristotle's Concept of Being-at-Work
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F18%3A10368256" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/18:10368256 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www2.uned.es/dpto_fim/InvFen/InvFen_M.07/pdf/32_MENSCH.pdf" target="_blank" >https://www2.uned.es/dpto_fim/InvFen/InvFen_M.07/pdf/32_MENSCH.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Phenomenology and Aristotle's Concept of Being-at-Work
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Husserl, as is well known, bases his study of appearing on subjective functions. He also makes appearing prior to being insofar phenomenology grants being to entities only to the point that they can appear. Both positions result in the paradox that he presents in the Crisis, where he asks: "How can human subjectivity, which is a part of the world, constitute the whole world, i.e., constitute it as its intentional product ...? The subjective part of the world swallows up, so to speak, the whole world including itself. What an absurdity!" The paradox arises from Husserl's taking being as presence and asserting that presence is established through constitution and, as such, is the work of subjectivity. In this article, I explore an alternative based on Aristotle's concept of functioning. This is a functioning that is prior to both subjects and objects, a functioning that is responsible for both being and appearing. The introduction of this concept, I argue, does not change Husserl's description of the functioning of constitution. It does, however, add an ontological basis that prevents phenomenology from falling into this paradox.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Phenomenology and Aristotle's Concept of Being-at-Work
Popis výsledku anglicky
Husserl, as is well known, bases his study of appearing on subjective functions. He also makes appearing prior to being insofar phenomenology grants being to entities only to the point that they can appear. Both positions result in the paradox that he presents in the Crisis, where he asks: "How can human subjectivity, which is a part of the world, constitute the whole world, i.e., constitute it as its intentional product ...? The subjective part of the world swallows up, so to speak, the whole world including itself. What an absurdity!" The paradox arises from Husserl's taking being as presence and asserting that presence is established through constitution and, as such, is the work of subjectivity. In this article, I explore an alternative based on Aristotle's concept of functioning. This is a functioning that is prior to both subjects and objects, a functioning that is responsible for both being and appearing. The introduction of this concept, I argue, does not change Husserl's description of the functioning of constitution. It does, however, add an ontological basis that prevents phenomenology from falling into this paradox.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Investegatciones Fenomenológicas, Journal of the Sociedad Española de Fenomenología. Monográfico 7. Special edition in honor of Lester Embre, ed. Maria-Luz Pintos-Peñaranda
ISSN
1137-2400
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
7
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2018
Stát vydavatele periodika
ES - Španělské království
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
511-522
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—