ASSESSMENT OF BENNETT'S MODEL OF DEVELOPMENTAL INTERCULTURAL SENSITIVITY

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F18%3A10391322" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/18:10391322 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2018/3.4" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2018/3.4</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2018/3.4" target="_blank" >10.5593/sgemsocial2018/3.4</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

ASSESSMENT OF BENNETT'S MODEL OF DEVELOPMENTAL INTERCULTURAL SENSITIVITY

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

While investigating various models of socialization and construction of self, it is argued in favour of Milton Bennett&apos;s developmental model of intercultural sensitivity, the importance of intercultural communicative competence as well as the significance of intercultural communication in general. Classical developmental models elaborated by authors such as Sigmund Freud, Lawrence Kohlberg, Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann put emphasis on the relevance of primary and secondary socialization and some of them also considered defence mechanisms against alternative cultural and symbolic worlds. On the other hand, Milton Bennett&apos;s scale or developmental model of intercultural sensitivity (DMIS) has managed to describe different responses to cultural differences; under the circumstances of globalization the most important contribution of it to developmental theories and intercultural communication has been the original thesis that an individual can move from ethnocentric phase to ethnorelative one. The ethnocentric phase has been characterised by several stages such as denial of difference (the individual becomes aware of difference between cultures), defence against difference (the person is introduced to similarities between cultures) and minimalisation of difference (the person understands the importance of intercultural difference); the ethnorelative one has been determined by acceptance of difference (the individual becomes aware of other cultures) adaptation to difference and integration of difference (individual develops empathy towards the other culture). Apart from the comparison to classical models, the introduction and the conclusion point to alternative perspectives on cultural differences that have been presented by authors such as Edward Hall, Geert Hofstede, Ingrid Piller, Fons Trompenaars, etc.

Název v anglickém jazyce

ASSESSMENT OF BENNETT'S MODEL OF DEVELOPMENTAL INTERCULTURAL SENSITIVITY

Popis výsledku anglicky

While investigating various models of socialization and construction of self, it is argued in favour of Milton Bennett&apos;s developmental model of intercultural sensitivity, the importance of intercultural communicative competence as well as the significance of intercultural communication in general. Classical developmental models elaborated by authors such as Sigmund Freud, Lawrence Kohlberg, Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann put emphasis on the relevance of primary and secondary socialization and some of them also considered defence mechanisms against alternative cultural and symbolic worlds. On the other hand, Milton Bennett&apos;s scale or developmental model of intercultural sensitivity (DMIS) has managed to describe different responses to cultural differences; under the circumstances of globalization the most important contribution of it to developmental theories and intercultural communication has been the original thesis that an individual can move from ethnocentric phase to ethnorelative one. The ethnocentric phase has been characterised by several stages such as denial of difference (the individual becomes aware of difference between cultures), defence against difference (the person is introduced to similarities between cultures) and minimalisation of difference (the person understands the importance of intercultural difference); the ethnorelative one has been determined by acceptance of difference (the individual becomes aware of other cultures) adaptation to difference and integration of difference (individual develops empathy towards the other culture). Apart from the comparison to classical models, the introduction and the conclusion point to alternative perspectives on cultural differences that have been presented by authors such as Edward Hall, Geert Hofstede, Ingrid Piller, Fons Trompenaars, etc.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50404 - Anthropology, ethnology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference On Social Sciences and Arts, SGEM 2018

ISBN

978-619-7408-56-0

ISSN

2367-5659

e-ISSN

neuvedeno

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

79-86

Název nakladatele

STEF92 Technology Ltd.

Místo vydání

Sofia, Bulgaria

Místo konání akce

BULGARIA

Datum konání akce

26. 8. 2018

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—