Ascertaining the Certainty of Uncertainty
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F20%3A10421452" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/20:10421452 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/cpsem201911" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/cpsem201911</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/cpsem201911" target="_blank" >10.5840/cpsem201911</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Ascertaining the Certainty of Uncertainty
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
When Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen considered reality in physics, the term "certainty" was the crucial one. According to them, every description of reality that is bound to be taken seriously has to have certainty of prediction of its characters. On this ground they dismissed the notion of quantum mechanics being complete description of nature. Bohr argued that the problem lies in previously unscrutinized idea of independent reality of every particle. There is no independence on measurements, because the particle and the apparatus exist in relation. If we conceive reality from the standpoint of Peirce's semiotic metaphysics we can argue that the proponents of said debate inferred different conceptions of reality from their differing criteria of representability, and that inherent uncertainty of quantum mechanics measurements is a part of physical reality, because everything that is given to us as reality is given to us as its representation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Ascertaining the Certainty of Uncertainty
Popis výsledku anglicky
When Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen considered reality in physics, the term "certainty" was the crucial one. According to them, every description of reality that is bound to be taken seriously has to have certainty of prediction of its characters. On this ground they dismissed the notion of quantum mechanics being complete description of nature. Bohr argued that the problem lies in previously unscrutinized idea of independent reality of every particle. There is no independence on measurements, because the particle and the apparatus exist in relation. If we conceive reality from the standpoint of Peirce's semiotic metaphysics we can argue that the proponents of said debate inferred different conceptions of reality from their differing criteria of representability, and that inherent uncertainty of quantum mechanics measurements is a part of physical reality, because everything that is given to us as reality is given to us as its representation.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Semiotics 2019: New Frontiers of Semiotics
ISBN
978-1-63435-061-7
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
55-65
Název nakladatele
Philosophy Documentation Center
Místo vydání
Charlottesville, VA
Místo konání akce
Portland, Oregon, USA
Datum konání akce
9. 10. 2019
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—