"Všechno stejný, všechno zastavený": Karanténa v "domově" pro lidi označené za postižené

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11240%2F22%3A10450609" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11240/22:10450609 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11620/22:10450609

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=y2GIuR4aOt" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=y2GIuR4aOt</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13060/csr.2022.029" target="_blank" >10.13060/csr.2022.029</a>

Jazyk výsledku

čeština

Název v původním jazyce

"Všechno stejný, všechno zastavený": Karanténa v "domově" pro lidi označené za postižené

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

While many evaluations of the response from residential social ser- vices to the COVID-19 pandemic have pointed to high mortality rates and hu- man rights violations, some have given a positive assessment of their perfor- mance. Whatever the verdict, it is a fact that the clients of residential social ser- vices were subject to stricter and longer lockdown measures than the rest of the population. Our ethnographic research describes the lockdown technologies used at Home F, a residential institution for people identified as disabled. Set- ting out from the assumption that freedom is not the antithesis of some united regulatory regime but is the result of the intersection of various repertoires and logics of influence, the research analyses the &apos;passages&apos; that regulate relations between the clients and their surroundings before and during the pandemic. It shows that the regulatory mechanisms that were put in place to facilitate an effective pandemic response do not constitute a new apparatus but only an intensification of technologies already in place. With the aim of mitigat- ing risk, they delegitimise the needs of clients, render relations dependent on obedience, and pass moralised judgements on behaviour. Such &apos;pedagogical arrangements&apos; cause emotional suffering and do not leave much space for free- dom. In the discussion in the article we link our findings to the current debates about the productivity of power and (post)critical pedagogy, concluding that while pedagogy necessarily accompanies the management of risks, a critical gesture that delegitimises the interests and opinions of the objects of pedagogy may not be the most appropriate pedagogical method available.Keywords: residential institutions, COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown measures, risk management, building maintenance, pedagogical relations, post-critical pedagogy

Název v anglickém jazyce

'Everything's the same, Everything's Halted': Quarantine in a 'Home' for People identified as Disabled

Popis výsledku anglicky

While many evaluations of the response from residential social ser- vices to the COVID-19 pandemic have pointed to high mortality rates and hu- man rights violations, some have given a positive assessment of their perfor- mance. Whatever the verdict, it is a fact that the clients of residential social ser- vices were subject to stricter and longer lockdown measures than the rest of the population. Our ethnographic research describes the lockdown technologies used at Home F, a residential institution for people identified as disabled. Set- ting out from the assumption that freedom is not the antithesis of some united regulatory regime but is the result of the intersection of various repertoires and logics of influence, the research analyses the &apos;passages&apos; that regulate relations between the clients and their surroundings before and during the pandemic. It shows that the regulatory mechanisms that were put in place to facilitate an effective pandemic response do not constitute a new apparatus but only an intensification of technologies already in place. With the aim of mitigat- ing risk, they delegitimise the needs of clients, render relations dependent on obedience, and pass moralised judgements on behaviour. Such &apos;pedagogical arrangements&apos; cause emotional suffering and do not leave much space for free- dom. In the discussion in the article we link our findings to the current debates about the productivity of power and (post)critical pedagogy, concluding that while pedagogy necessarily accompanies the management of risks, a critical gesture that delegitimises the interests and opinions of the objects of pedagogy may not be the most appropriate pedagogical method available.Keywords: residential institutions, COVID-19 pandemic, lockdown measures, risk management, building maintenance, pedagogical relations, post-critical pedagogy

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-07724S" target="_blank" >GA19-07724S: Zranitelní obyvatelé v křehkých obydlích: Dvojí starost pobytových služeb</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review

ISSN

0038-0288

e-ISSN

2336-128X

Svazek periodika

58

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

23

Strana od-do

563-585

Kód UT WoS článku

000886365800004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85142274548