Evaluation of the variation in relative response factors of GC-MS analysis with the internal standard methods: Application for the alcoholic products quality control
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11310%2F22%3A10452168" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11310/22:10452168 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=D-z4IlNkeJ" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=D-z4IlNkeJ</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123518" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123518</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Evaluation of the variation in relative response factors of GC-MS analysis with the internal standard methods: Application for the alcoholic products quality control
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This paper focuses on the evaluation of variation of relative response factors (RRFs) obtained by two internal standard (IS) methods that are used to control the quality of alcoholic products. A standard IS method using 1-pentanol was compared with an "Ethanol as IS" method. The variation of RRF values for both methods was determined using standard solutions based on 20, 40 and 96% ethanol-water matrices. For this purpose, solutions of the ten most abundant volatile compounds were analysed at four different concentrations (250, 500, 1000 and 5000 mg L(-1) absolute alcohol, AA) within these matrices. Each solution was measured four times by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in single ion monitoring (SIM) mode under repeatability conditions. Our results showed that for the 40% and 96% matrices, the ethanol and standard IS methods showed similar relative standard deviations (RSDs) variation of no more than 2% within the 250-1000 mg L(-1) AA volatile compounds concentration range. For the 20% matrix as well as for the 250-5000 mg L(-1) AA concentration range the resulting variation in calibration factors reaches 10% for both methods. As for the whole range of 20-96% alcohol by volume (ABV) and 250-5000 mg L(-1) AA volatile concentration range, the resultant RRFs for the standard IS method (8% RSD) were more stable than those for the ethanol IS method (almost 40% RSD). Nonlinearity of the signal-to-amount dependence was also assessed with respect to the injection and detection processes.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Evaluation of the variation in relative response factors of GC-MS analysis with the internal standard methods: Application for the alcoholic products quality control
Popis výsledku anglicky
This paper focuses on the evaluation of variation of relative response factors (RRFs) obtained by two internal standard (IS) methods that are used to control the quality of alcoholic products. A standard IS method using 1-pentanol was compared with an "Ethanol as IS" method. The variation of RRF values for both methods was determined using standard solutions based on 20, 40 and 96% ethanol-water matrices. For this purpose, solutions of the ten most abundant volatile compounds were analysed at four different concentrations (250, 500, 1000 and 5000 mg L(-1) absolute alcohol, AA) within these matrices. Each solution was measured four times by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) in single ion monitoring (SIM) mode under repeatability conditions. Our results showed that for the 40% and 96% matrices, the ethanol and standard IS methods showed similar relative standard deviations (RSDs) variation of no more than 2% within the 250-1000 mg L(-1) AA volatile compounds concentration range. For the 20% matrix as well as for the 250-5000 mg L(-1) AA concentration range the resulting variation in calibration factors reaches 10% for both methods. As for the whole range of 20-96% alcohol by volume (ABV) and 250-5000 mg L(-1) AA volatile concentration range, the resultant RRFs for the standard IS method (8% RSD) were more stable than those for the ethanol IS method (almost 40% RSD). Nonlinearity of the signal-to-amount dependence was also assessed with respect to the injection and detection processes.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10406 - Analytical chemistry
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Talanta
ISSN
0039-9140
e-ISSN
1873-3573
Svazek periodika
246
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
August
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
123518
Kód UT WoS článku
000892633900008
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85129268038