Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary School

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F16%3A10333294" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/16:10333294 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/298" target="_blank" >http://scied.cz/index.php/scied/article/view/298</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary School

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article describes the results of the case study "Implementation of the Peer Instruction method into education in the Czech Republic", trying to answer one main question: "How is the Peer Instruction method implemented into physics teaching at upper secondary Czech school?". The data was collected through interviews with the teacher, lesson observation and questionnaires for the teacher and students. The teacher involved in the study had been interested in the method since 2009. The research findings resulting from lesson observation and students' opinions are from the 2014/2015 school year, when the method was implemented with students aged 17-18 years in three physics classes taught at an upper secondary school, with the respective numbers of students being 28, 16 and 13. The research generated the following conclusions, among other things: (1) the method should ideally be used immediately after a presentation of a new topic, therefore e.g. once a month, (2) a maximum of two ConcepTest questions should be used within one 45-minute lesson, and (3) students' responses should be collected by means of flashcards rather than by an electronic voting system. The teacher starting with the method expected that ConcepTest questions would be simple for students and the work pace would be faster. She tried to hasten the work and therefore sometimes did not give students enough time to think about their responses, occasionally even failing to provide the option of a second answer. Nevertheless, the participating students gave positive feedback on this method, strongly indicating that that they had learned more while using this method. They admitted that using flashcards during the first answering was a strong incentive that boosted their motivation towards thinking about the answers. This article is intended for people interested in the Peer Instruction method, teachers and researchers in active learning.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary School

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article describes the results of the case study "Implementation of the Peer Instruction method into education in the Czech Republic", trying to answer one main question: "How is the Peer Instruction method implemented into physics teaching at upper secondary Czech school?". The data was collected through interviews with the teacher, lesson observation and questionnaires for the teacher and students. The teacher involved in the study had been interested in the method since 2009. The research findings resulting from lesson observation and students' opinions are from the 2014/2015 school year, when the method was implemented with students aged 17-18 years in three physics classes taught at an upper secondary school, with the respective numbers of students being 28, 16 and 13. The research generated the following conclusions, among other things: (1) the method should ideally be used immediately after a presentation of a new topic, therefore e.g. once a month, (2) a maximum of two ConcepTest questions should be used within one 45-minute lesson, and (3) students' responses should be collected by means of flashcards rather than by an electronic voting system. The teacher starting with the method expected that ConcepTest questions would be simple for students and the work pace would be faster. She tried to hasten the work and therefore sometimes did not give students enough time to think about their responses, occasionally even failing to provide the option of a second answer. Nevertheless, the participating students gave positive feedback on this method, strongly indicating that that they had learned more while using this method. They admitted that using flashcards during the first answering was a strong incentive that boosted their motivation towards thinking about the answers. This article is intended for people interested in the Peer Instruction method, teachers and researchers in active learning.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AM - Pedagogika a školství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Scientia in educatione

ISSN

1804-7106

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

7

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

111-127

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—