Adjectival intensification in West Germanic: A corpus-based comparison of Afrikaans, Dutch, English and German
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F23%3A64E536QR" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/23:64E536QR - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23016.van" target="_blank" >https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23016.van</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sl.23016.van" target="_blank" >10.1075/sl.23016.van</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Adjectival intensification in West Germanic: A corpus-based comparison of Afrikaans, Dutch, English and German
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
"Abstract This article investigates the forms and functions of adjectival intensification in West Germanic. With corpus data from different discourse types, we challenge claims that German tends to use synthetic means and Dutch is between German and English but more like English in its preference for analytic ones. Our results show that all three languages, and Afrikaans too, favor analytic intensifiers but also that only English employs synthetic ones to a lesser extent. The other languages are found to use synthetic forms more especially in literature. The study also offers corpus-based support for an earlier hypothesis that both English and German prefer amplifying to downtoning adjectives. We show that this tendency exists more pronouncedly in Afrikaans and Dutch too and that English speech stands out with more functionally ambiguous intensifiers. The article also explores possible explanations for its findings in (dis)similarities in word formation, discourse types’ linguistic potential and politeness"
Název v anglickém jazyce
Adjectival intensification in West Germanic: A corpus-based comparison of Afrikaans, Dutch, English and German
Popis výsledku anglicky
"Abstract This article investigates the forms and functions of adjectival intensification in West Germanic. With corpus data from different discourse types, we challenge claims that German tends to use synthetic means and Dutch is between German and English but more like English in its preference for analytic ones. Our results show that all three languages, and Afrikaans too, favor analytic intensifiers but also that only English employs synthetic ones to a lesser extent. The other languages are found to use synthetic forms more especially in literature. The study also offers corpus-based support for an earlier hypothesis that both English and German prefer amplifying to downtoning adjectives. We show that this tendency exists more pronouncedly in Afrikaans and Dutch too and that English speech stands out with more functionally ambiguous intensifiers. The article also explores possible explanations for its findings in (dis)similarities in word formation, discourse types’ linguistic potential and politeness"
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
—
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
"Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”"
ISSN
0378-4177
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
""
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2023-10-31
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
36
Strana od-do
1-36
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—