DocuScope, multi-dimensional analysis, and student writing: Comparisons across tagging systems and corpora

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F23%3AJA4WEQQW" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/23:JA4WEQQW - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85165170893&doi=10.1075%2fscl.109.03dej&partnerID=40&md5=ce67f72c058d12bef41ebce095392e21" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85165170893&doi=10.1075%2fscl.109.03dej&partnerID=40&md5=ce67f72c058d12bef41ebce095392e21</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/scl.109.03dej" target="_blank" >10.1075/scl.109.03dej</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

DocuScope, multi-dimensional analysis, and student writing: Comparisons across tagging systems and corpora

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

"In this chapter, we present a method for comparing tagging systems and patterns of disciplinary variation in corpora of student writing. We begin by highlighting the affordances of rhetorically and linguistically informed tagging systems by highlighting similarities and differences in each system’s analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP). Results confirm that both taggers produce statistically robust results in distinguishing disciplines across three dimensions and also highlight commonalities and differences that reflect the taggers’ respective theoretical orientations. Then, we present the results of a DocuScope-driven comparison of the British Academic Written English (BAWE) and MICUSP corpora and summarize topical and rhetorical patterns of disciplinary writing that seem fairly stable across national contexts. This chapter’s findings should prove useful to scholars interested in comparative methodologies of corpus analysis and rhetorical measures of disciplinary variation as well as those who work in or research writing in the disciplines. © 2023 John Benjamins Publishing Company."

Název v anglickém jazyce

DocuScope, multi-dimensional analysis, and student writing: Comparisons across tagging systems and corpora

Popis výsledku anglicky

"In this chapter, we present a method for comparing tagging systems and patterns of disciplinary variation in corpora of student writing. We begin by highlighting the affordances of rhetorically and linguistically informed tagging systems by highlighting similarities and differences in each system’s analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP). Results confirm that both taggers produce statistically robust results in distinguishing disciplines across three dimensions and also highlight commonalities and differences that reflect the taggers’ respective theoretical orientations. Then, we present the results of a DocuScope-driven comparison of the British Academic Written English (BAWE) and MICUSP corpora and summarize topical and rhetorical patterns of disciplinary writing that seem fairly stable across national contexts. This chapter’s findings should prove useful to scholars interested in comparative methodologies of corpus analysis and rhetorical measures of disciplinary variation as well as those who work in or research writing in the disciplines. © 2023 John Benjamins Publishing Company."

Druh

J_SC - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

—

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

"Stud. Corpus Linguist."

ISSN

1388-0373

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

109

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2023

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

38

Strana od-do

41-78

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85165170893