Same yet diferent Distributional diferences in the use of partitive objects in Estonian and Finnish
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00216208%3A11320%2F25%3A6GFF4UWB" target="_blank" >RIV/00216208:11320/25:6GFF4UWB - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188192848&doi=10.1075%2flv.23042.iva&partnerID=40&md5=cba7263b8ee556994cb6a0dd5dab687a" target="_blank" >https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85188192848&doi=10.1075%2flv.23042.iva&partnerID=40&md5=cba7263b8ee556994cb6a0dd5dab687a</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lv.23042.iva" target="_blank" >10.1075/lv.23042.iva</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Same yet diferent Distributional diferences in the use of partitive objects in Estonian and Finnish
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The article compares the distributional diferences in the use of the partitive object cases in Estonian and Finnish via multifactorial modeling in contrastive research using the European Parliament parallel text corpus. Based on previous contrastive research on Finnic, we expected the principles of object case marking to be similar for Estonian and Finnish (confrmed), and the partitive objects to be more numerous in Estonian than in Finnish (not confrmed, as countable objects with scalar verbs proved less likely to be partitive in Estonian). We hypothesized that multifactorial modeling in contrastive research design could help identify the causes for variation and unfold subtle diferences between related language systems. Since preferences related to grammatical voice and constituent order revealed subtle diferences between the systems, this hypothesis was confrmed. © 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company. All rights reserved.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Same yet diferent Distributional diferences in the use of partitive objects in Estonian and Finnish
Popis výsledku anglicky
The article compares the distributional diferences in the use of the partitive object cases in Estonian and Finnish via multifactorial modeling in contrastive research using the European Parliament parallel text corpus. Based on previous contrastive research on Finnic, we expected the principles of object case marking to be similar for Estonian and Finnish (confrmed), and the partitive objects to be more numerous in Estonian than in Finnish (not confrmed, as countable objects with scalar verbs proved less likely to be partitive in Estonian). We hypothesized that multifactorial modeling in contrastive research design could help identify the causes for variation and unfold subtle diferences between related language systems. Since preferences related to grammatical voice and constituent order revealed subtle diferences between the systems, this hypothesis was confrmed. © 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company. All rights reserved.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
—
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Linguistic Variation
ISSN
2211-6834
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
24
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
49
Strana od-do
323-371
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85188192848